Beetle Moses | Bluesky

Transcript

Three panel comic.

Panel 1: a guy wearing swim trunks and a snorkeling mask walks confidently into the ocean on a public beach surrounded by some scattered onlookers. He is carrying an electric lantern and his snorkeling tube is very tall, extending up and out of the frame.

Panel 2: he continues forward into the water, nearly fully submerged with only the top of his head above water. The snorkel is still too tall to be seen completely in frame. The onlookers watch blankly as he disappears under the surface.

Panel 3: the guy is walking casually at the abyssal floor of the ocean, where no light penetrates. His electric lantern illuminates his immediate vicinity. He is surrounded by a collection of weird deep sea creatures, including a deep sea isopod, vampire squid, chimaera, and barrel eye fish. Can you name all the creatures in frame?

  • Nurgus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I disagree with the transcript. He’s clearly bringing a bottle of wine to his new friends. That was my first impression and I’m sticking with it.

  • solidheron@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Breathing through tube would become impossible after 4 feet deep, mass me wonder how scuba divers breath then I realize the that the tanks put out a lot of pressure

    • Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m also very much doubting the scale of some of those deep sea creatures. The problem is most of the footage of them that exists does so without anything for scale. Most of them are quite tiny. The goblin shark might be just about right.

      • JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Quite a few of the photos taken are shot around the base of oil rigs, so we do actually have a scale for some of them.

      • Wataba@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Breathing becomes impossible beyond that length because there’s no time for fresh air to get in. He’d suffocate on his own exhalation before long.

        • ammonium@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          If that was the only issue one could just not breath out in the tube. But there’s another problem: Breathing becomes impossible because you can’t breathe due to the pressure of the water on your chest.

          • wewbull@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            35 minutes ago

            Yep. Keep going and you’ll be forced up the tube in a fashion not unlike toothpaste.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I know its just a comic but when I see these I can’t ignore the reality that a snorkel doesn’t work if you are that deep. You can’t overcome the pressure differential.

    • Zwiebel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      17 hours ago

      You’d be breathing in and out the same air from the tube anyways, since its volume would be larger than you lungs

        • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 hours ago

          That’s where the water pressure problem kicks in. You only have to be a couple feet down before you can’t expand your chest enough to get a breath through a tube. It’s very surprising.

        • Emi@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Never thought of that, you would need to keep the water from entering the snorkel tho. Or just put pressurised air from the surface into the snorkel but then you just end up with old timey diving suit.

          • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            You mean because of taking the mouthpiece out of your mouth? Just breathe in through the snorkel and out through your nose. The unbeatable problem is the water pressure on your chest keeping you from inhaling.

    • ekZepp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      This comics remember me of a Darwin awards case i’ve read a while ago. The poor fella did some deep immersion under a lake using only a veeery long tube to breath. You can guess how it ended.

      • M137@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        “This comic made me remember a Darwin awards case I read a while ago”*

        I’m just trying to teach grammar and spelling, not busting your balls over it. It’s clear English isn’t your first language, same as me, just showing the correct (I think) way to write that sentence.
        You did nothing wrong, I just saw an opportunity to show improvement and hope it helps. Continue learning, of course jot only English grammar and spelling but everything in life.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        22 hours ago

        How? Surely you would find out almost immediately that you can’t inhale against the water pressure and then just surface. It’s not like you are getting to 15m before you struggle, IIRC for most people you will be struggling or completely unable to inhale by just 1m. Even with training you are at best adding a few cm.

      • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        22 hours ago

        but… how? I mean, don’t you feel it before dying that you can’t breath? Or he had too heavy gears to swim back at the surface?

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          19 hours ago

          " The Missouri State Water Patrol said he used the hose to snorkel 30-feet below the surface, with a 20-pound boat anchor tied to his waist to help him reach the bottom. "

      • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I had that same physics lesson. Young me was so excited bringing the end of the hose, covered by my hand, to the bottom of the pool. I was almost out of breath when I got down there because swimming down while covering the hose was hard, but I figured it wasn’t a problem because I was about to be able to breathe through it. I was pretty panicked when I quickly jammed the hose end into my mouth and it tried so suck the air out of me harder than I could suck it in.

        • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I went into the pool with the hose in my mouth, so no problem with pressure. But a couple breaths later it was nothing but carbon dioxide so I didn’t make it too far before surfacing.

    • kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 hours ago

      This is an actual product though! I’ve seen them with filters at the top so waves don’t suffocate you.

      I hope they have something weighing them down, air in your lungs makes you wanna float

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Are you thinking of regular length snorkels with a valve? Never heard of longer ones as it’s impossible to inhale against water pressure as you dive, plus it would be difficult to hold onto a very long tube.

        Would like to do some snorkeling but the sea around where I live has pretty limited visibility, at best you can make out where your feet are. Got a swimming mask though and have seen some tiny fish before. But it’s also a steeply sloping gravel beach so you almost immediately would be beyond snorkel depth and have to be free diving to get to the bottom

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            57 minutes ago

            10m is deep enough to have to consider the bends (decompression sickness). That’s definitely into diving rules territory.

            The particular risk is it cutting off, due to the battery dying, forcing a rapid ascent.

            • kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 minutes ago

              I hope people using this device know about the bends! That company does list a reserve tank that has 10 minutes of air stored, which is the same as rising 1m per minute so they definitely thought of it.

          • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Interesting, although I feel like that is more like diving equipment than snorkeling.

              • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                No, the difference is that snorkeling is something anyone can do, diving requires training. Largely because diving is far more likely to kill you if you do something you may not realise is a bad idea.

                Not a trained diver but stuff like lung overpressure sounds pretty bad and can’t be caused snorkeling but could be caused with diving equipment.

      • Devadander@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yes, snorkels exist. But the depth they are usable is limited to only about a meter, before you cannot take in air

          • Badabinski@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            21 hours ago

            That device kinda terrifies me. Like, I appreciate that SCUBA gear is so… simple. No electronics, no batteries, just relatively straightforward pneumatic equipment. At least you’re not very deep if the compressor shits the bed.

            • kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Same, as a SCUBA diver I would take a snorkel over this and just dive down. I’d probably give it a shot to test out once though

          • Devadander@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Fascinating, but that’s not a snorkel. More like a modernized version of the old manned bellows on ships supplying air to the diver below

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You would stop being able to inhale before that becomes a concern (every 10m of water creating 1 atm of pressure on your body impeding you to expand your lungs).

      • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        What’s the lowest a human could dive before suffocating because of the lack of muscular strength to inhale?

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Quite pathetic, actually. Only maybe 3 to 4 meters.

          Human lungs are not designed to resist outside pressure like that.

          • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            I was honestly not aware of how much support air tanks provide, as I have been 30m deep.

            • OwOarchist@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              18 hours ago

              You should try breathing through a long tube sometime. (While being fully aware that you’ll probably need to swim back to the surface in order to breathe!) Even at very shallow depths, it becomes quite difficult. By the time you get to the bottom of an average swimming pool, it becomes completely impossible.