Beetle Moses | Bluesky

Transcript

Three panel comic.

Panel 1: a guy wearing swim trunks and a snorkeling mask walks confidently into the ocean on a public beach surrounded by some scattered onlookers. He is carrying an electric lantern and his snorkeling tube is very tall, extending up and out of the frame.

Panel 2: he continues forward into the water, nearly fully submerged with only the top of his head above water. The snorkel is still too tall to be seen completely in frame. The onlookers watch blankly as he disappears under the surface.

Panel 3: the guy is walking casually at the abyssal floor of the ocean, where no light penetrates. His electric lantern illuminates his immediate vicinity. He is surrounded by a collection of weird deep sea creatures, including a deep sea isopod, vampire squid, chimaera, and barrel eye fish. Can you name all the creatures in frame?

  • kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is an actual product though! I’ve seen them with filters at the top so waves don’t suffocate you.

    I hope they have something weighing them down, air in your lungs makes you wanna float

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      Are you thinking of regular length snorkels with a valve? Never heard of longer ones as it’s impossible to inhale against water pressure as you dive, plus it would be difficult to hold onto a very long tube.

      Would like to do some snorkeling but the sea around where I live has pretty limited visibility, at best you can make out where your feet are. Got a swimming mask though and have seen some tiny fish before. But it’s also a steeply sloping gravel beach so you almost immediately would be beyond snorkel depth and have to be free diving to get to the bottom

        • cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          10m is deep enough to have to consider the bends (decompression sickness). That’s definitely into diving rules territory.

          The particular risk is it cutting off, due to the battery dying, forcing a rapid ascent.

          • kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I hope people using this device know about the bends! That company does list a reserve tank that has 10 minutes of air stored, which is the same as rising 1m per minute so they definitely thought of it.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Interesting, although I feel like that is more like diving equipment than snorkeling.

            • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              No, the difference is that snorkeling is something anyone can do, diving requires training. Largely because diving is far more likely to kill you if you do something you may not realise is a bad idea.

              Not a trained diver but stuff like lung overpressure sounds pretty bad and can’t be caused snorkeling but could be caused with diving equipment.

    • Devadander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, snorkels exist. But the depth they are usable is limited to only about a meter, before you cannot take in air

        • Badabinski@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          That device kinda terrifies me. Like, I appreciate that SCUBA gear is so… simple. No electronics, no batteries, just relatively straightforward pneumatic equipment. At least you’re not very deep if the compressor shits the bed.

          • kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Same, as a SCUBA diver I would take a snorkel over this and just dive down. I’d probably give it a shot to test out once though

        • Devadander@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Fascinating, but that’s not a snorkel. More like a modernized version of the old manned bellows on ships supplying air to the diver below

          • kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s a bit pedantic isn’t it.

            “A long snorkel wouldn’t work you’d need a compressor”

            provides one with a mini floating compressor

            “Yeah but now it’s no longer a snorkel”

            Okay

            • Devadander@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Who are you quoting? There’s no need to make up arguments and insult me. That’s not a snorkel by definition.

              • kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                I’m quoting this chain of replies? Context is important before you start replying. Just because you didn’t write the first doesnt make it’s context irrelevant.

                “Hope he has an air compressor at the top of that snorkle”

                “Those exist!”

                “Now it’s not a snorkel anymore”

                I cut out the part where you misunderstood my reply and had a snarky “yes, snorkels exist” but that’s the gist of it