Beetle Moses | Bluesky

Transcript

Three panel comic.

Panel 1: a guy wearing swim trunks and a snorkeling mask walks confidently into the ocean on a public beach surrounded by some scattered onlookers. He is carrying an electric lantern and his snorkeling tube is very tall, extending up and out of the frame.

Panel 2: he continues forward into the water, nearly fully submerged with only the top of his head above water. The snorkel is still too tall to be seen completely in frame. The onlookers watch blankly as he disappears under the surface.

Panel 3: the guy is walking casually at the abyssal floor of the ocean, where no light penetrates. His electric lantern illuminates his immediate vicinity. He is surrounded by a collection of weird deep sea creatures, including a deep sea isopod, vampire squid, chimaera, and barrel eye fish. Can you name all the creatures in frame?

    • ekZepp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This comics remember me of a Darwin awards case i’ve read a while ago. The poor fella did some deep immersion under a lake using only a veeery long tube to breath. You can guess how it ended.

      • M137@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        “This comic made me remember a Darwin awards case I read a while ago”*

        I’m just trying to teach grammar and spelling, not busting your balls over it. It’s clear English isn’t your first language, same as me, just showing the correct (I think) way to write that sentence.
        You did nothing wrong, I just saw an opportunity to show improvement and hope it helps. Continue learning, of course jot only English grammar and spelling but everything in life.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        ·
        1 day ago

        How? Surely you would find out almost immediately that you can’t inhale against the water pressure and then just surface. It’s not like you are getting to 15m before you struggle, IIRC for most people you will be struggling or completely unable to inhale by just 1m. Even with training you are at best adding a few cm.

      • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        but… how? I mean, don’t you feel it before dying that you can’t breath? Or he had too heavy gears to swim back at the surface?

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 day ago

          " The Missouri State Water Patrol said he used the hose to snorkel 30-feet below the surface, with a 20-pound boat anchor tied to his waist to help him reach the bottom. "

      • I had that same physics lesson. Young me was so excited bringing the end of the hose, covered by my hand, to the bottom of the pool. I was almost out of breath when I got down there because swimming down while covering the hose was hard, but I figured it wasn’t a problem because I was about to be able to breathe through it. I was pretty panicked when I quickly jammed the hose end into my mouth and it tried so suck the air out of me harder than I could suck it in.

        • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          I went into the pool with the hose in my mouth, so no problem with pressure. But a couple breaths later it was nothing but carbon dioxide so I didn’t make it too far before surfacing.

          • Murse@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Wouldn’t the easy fix there be to just exhale through your nose? Let the CO2 just escape, and use the hose only for inhalation.

            • riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Yes, but still. Water is going to want to fill the hose. You’d have to have the hose in your mouth for the entire descent and the deeper you go, the harder that water is going to push to try and get in that hose.

              Like, a quarter-sized leak in a canoe might trickle in but a similar leak in a cruise liner (which is much further under the surface) would be like a geyser.

            • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Could be. 12-year-old me didn’t think it was important enough to walk on the bottom of the pool to iterate on the idea.

              Let me know how it goes.

    • kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is an actual product though! I’ve seen them with filters at the top so waves don’t suffocate you.

      I hope they have something weighing them down, air in your lungs makes you wanna float

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        Are you thinking of regular length snorkels with a valve? Never heard of longer ones as it’s impossible to inhale against water pressure as you dive, plus it would be difficult to hold onto a very long tube.

        Would like to do some snorkeling but the sea around where I live has pretty limited visibility, at best you can make out where your feet are. Got a swimming mask though and have seen some tiny fish before. But it’s also a steeply sloping gravel beach so you almost immediately would be beyond snorkel depth and have to be free diving to get to the bottom

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            10m is deep enough to have to consider the bends (decompression sickness). That’s definitely into diving rules territory.

            The particular risk is it cutting off, due to the battery dying, forcing a rapid ascent.

            • kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              I hope people using this device know about the bends! That company does list a reserve tank that has 10 minutes of air stored, which is the same as rising 1m per minute so they definitely thought of it.

          • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Interesting, although I feel like that is more like diving equipment than snorkeling.

              • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                No, the difference is that snorkeling is something anyone can do, diving requires training. Largely because diving is far more likely to kill you if you do something you may not realise is a bad idea.

                Not a trained diver but stuff like lung overpressure sounds pretty bad and can’t be caused snorkeling but could be caused with diving equipment.

      • Devadander@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, snorkels exist. But the depth they are usable is limited to only about a meter, before you cannot take in air

          • Badabinski@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            That device kinda terrifies me. Like, I appreciate that SCUBA gear is so… simple. No electronics, no batteries, just relatively straightforward pneumatic equipment. At least you’re not very deep if the compressor shits the bed.

            • kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Same, as a SCUBA diver I would take a snorkel over this and just dive down. I’d probably give it a shot to test out once though

          • Devadander@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Fascinating, but that’s not a snorkel. More like a modernized version of the old manned bellows on ships supplying air to the diver below

            • kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              That’s a bit pedantic isn’t it.

              “A long snorkel wouldn’t work you’d need a compressor”

              provides one with a mini floating compressor

              “Yeah but now it’s no longer a snorkel”

              Okay

              • Devadander@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Who are you quoting? There’s no need to make up arguments and insult me. That’s not a snorkel by definition.

                • kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  I’m quoting this chain of replies? Context is important before you start replying. Just because you didn’t write the first doesnt make it’s context irrelevant.

                  “Hope he has an air compressor at the top of that snorkle”

                  “Those exist!”

                  “Now it’s not a snorkel anymore”

                  I cut out the part where you misunderstood my reply and had a snarky “yes, snorkels exist” but that’s the gist of it