• Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 minutes ago

    Also, fuck the media in the US. They won’t hesitate to smear your full name and photo all over the country before anything’s even proven.

    Just shows how rotten the USA is. For a mistake that’s not even hers and probably a trivial amount of money, nobody even hesitates to destroy her live.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Well, Walmart’s getting a lawsuit.

    They should have checked the self scan footage first. Police made an unreasonable search. Carrying someone elses anti-nausea meds is hardly case for anything.

    There should be a whole gaggle of US lawsuits out of this

  • tigermountain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    If she knew she scanned the items, there was no THC in the vapes, and the pills weren’t hers, why did she resign? And then why didn’t the university take her back after the truth was revealed? And why wouldn’t they have forcefully defended her by showing the evidence that she committed no crime? We better find a way to push back against the power of the Internet to create these conditions.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      because PR.

      your employer isn’t interested in truth and justice, they are interested in avoiding bad PR.

      the same reason that anyone who gets a false charges basically has their life ruined, nobody wants to associate with the association of crime, even if you are proven innocent, the fact you were charged at all makes you guilty in the court of public opinion. and pushing back, just makes you look more guilty.

  • innermachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Meanwhile I’ll walk right out of walmart with shit on occasion. Don’t wanna pay a cashier? That’s fine I didn’t wanna give you my money anyways ✌️

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Well, congratulations! She just hit the Walmart Lottery! Who needs a career when you got a multi-million dollar settlement with Walmart?

    I mean, that’s terrible! That poor woman, whatever will she do?

  • thingAmaBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    After watching body cam footage, I’ve recently began to hesitate using these. Mistakes can happen to literally anyone; I’ve made so many with these things in the past.

  • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This is one of the reasons I refuse to use self checkout if there is any other option.

    And yes, going to another store is an option I’ve used before.

  • gallopingsnail@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    16 hours ago

    two unopened packs of Zofran, a medication used to prevent nausea and vomiting in cancer patients. It’s a controlled substance but does not produce euphoria or a high that recreational drug users typically seek.

    Bruh, what the fuck even is this reporting. Zofran (ondansetron) is given to all sorts of patients for nausea and vomiting, not just cancer patients, and it sure as shit isn’t a controlled substance.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      14 hours ago

      i was confused because its used for nausea, pregnant woman uses it too, and its not illegal to carry it. unless she was planning to sell it for some reason.

  • upsidedown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Jfc how can conclusion be that the self chdckout was THE problem?

    Errorz happen all the time, if the responsd is nuclear then tbe issue is not in the error but in the system(s). Why the fuck call police over two items. Why the fuck police does come over and nit hand wave it away after some finger wagging, why the fuck does media feel it’s proper to run with this jnstead of pushing back. Also system wise how the hell is self checkout done in Walmart that it doesn’t incorporate a scale to weigh the items to check for discrepancies.

    The hell is all of this story, poor lady feel bad for her.

    • clifmo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Seems rather important to note the potential criminal liability one assumes when using self-checkout. You can be charged with crimes for a failure by the self-checkout system.

      • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yup, my friend is a lawyer and he refuses to use self checkout for any reason: he doesn’t want to assume the liability.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      How is it the checkout’s fault?

      They claimed she didn’t scan those items, out of $176 worth of items. That made her subject to arrest and search, where more issues were discovered and racking up the charges.

      Then they discovered that she HAD scammed the initial items, but the CHECK OUT machine didn’t register them. Which means the search that found the other items was illegal, and they got the additional items wrong, too, exacerbating the legal incompetence.

      And it turns out to all be mistakes made entirely by Walmart, with absolutely no blame on her for ANY of it.

      As a result of that series of mistakes by Walmart, she lost the job she loved, and the career she built. Those are extremely serious damages, and it all goes back to Walmart’s pile of mistakes.

      Walmart ruined this woman’s life, and it’s going to cost them MILLIONS. They’ll pay, they don’t want to take a chance with jury with someone like me on it. I’d award her the entire company, and every Walton fortune.

    • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      People seem to be losing all semblance of a social contract. Need to enforce every minor thing via over the top legal force.

  • Abyssian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    This might just be crazy talk… but perhaps normal humans should be considered something like “not guilty until proven guilty”? It doesn’t make any sense at all to destroy someone’s good name and trash their career because they’re accused of a thing.

    We do it for the rich and powerful. We don’t have a certified notarized video of Trump beating and raping little kids, so the massive amount of evidence that says he almost certainly did hasn’t caused him to lose what was once seen as the most prestigious job in the world. We don’t have a live stream of McConnell’s rotting corpse so he’s still “alive” for a few more hours until they break the news.

    And… fuck walmart. You’re going to set up all those self checkouts instead of paying cashiers then when a customer buying $200 of groceries is found with an item that didn’t scan call the fucking cops on them instead of just having them pay for it? For someone who clearly has no history of that happening, the very first time it happens? How is that sane or reasonable?

    Since the charges were dropped I hope her next step is suing the shit out of walmart. They falsely accused her of a crime due to their own equipment malfunctioning and caused all of this.

      • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’d sue the individual security officers who decided to call police for their own store’s malfunction. The security officers not only failed at their job but put her life directly in danger over ham. I wouldn’t even sue Walmart. I’d go directly after the individuals.

  • mrmisses@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    332
    ·
    1 day ago

    It was later revealed that Pettipiece did scan the ham and asparagus, but Walmart’s scanner failed to register the scans. Also, the vape pens contained no THC, and the anti-nausea pills didn’t belong to her.

    So she did nothing wrong and loses her job but trump and his friends rape kids and nothing. Shit ass country

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      167
      ·
      1 day ago

      It was later revealed that Pettipiece did scan the ham and asparagus

      Absolutely insane this came to anything more than “please pay us for the ham and asparagus” from a check out clerk.

      The need to arbitrarily ruin people’s lives over any perceived infraction, because of some mythological view of law enforcement…

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’ve accidentally missed things in the scanner, both because the scanner messed up and because sometimes I fuck up. It happens. Just ask to see the receipt and point out the missing items. Problem solved.

        If you’re too scared to ask to see a receipt from someone because you think they’re dangerous, then maybe it isn’t worth risking a confrontation between them and the police in the parking lot over a couple dollars’ worth of groceries.

      • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Many years ago, my grandpa accidentally stole a pack of screws. While buying an electric drill, at a diy-store he was a regular customer at.

        What did they do? Called the police, when the police showed up he went straight back to return the drill and vowed to never set a foot again.

        Some stores really dislikes being human, and this happened in an area of Denmark far away from the capital and thus control of law

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        66
        ·
        1 day ago

        Thank you!

        Like, I’ve been turned back to pay for items that a cashier missed without cops being called and they didn’t arrest (or fire) the cashier either. There’s really no reason to go straight to “arrest for theft”

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 day ago

        I understand the rationale behind punishing an attempt at theft if that’s what actually happened, otherwise a would-be thief has no incentive not to try. It’s critical to be right before doing that.

        The drug charges are just fucked. Drug possession should not be a crime.

        • ReptilianCleric@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Yeah, I’m so done hearing about crime reduction by making examples of people.

          It’s an asinine perversion of logic to even consider that argument.

          • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Loss prevention is built into every business’ insurance policy. Major corporations don’t lose money from shoplifting any more than they lose money from throwing out old food. It’s all written off and covered.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          47
          ·
          1 day ago

          I understand the rationale behind punishing an attempt at theft if that’s what actually happened

          Let’s assume that - deliberately and with malice of forethought - this person stole asparagus.

          What is the appropriate punishment?

          The drug charges are just fucked.

          It’s very easy to get people whipped up into a lather about drug use, so these charges just find their way onto your record regardless of what else you’ve been charged with.

        • Laurel Raven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 day ago

          Disagree, it’s petty theft at absolute worst, and there’s no good reason to react that way to it.

          Give the option to pay or return it, make note of the person so if they make a habit of it you can respond, but this is just ridiculous

          • tmyakal@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            make note of the person so if they make a habit of it you can respond

            With the rise of the surveillance state, I don’t know why this isn’t the best option for the store and the cops. Wal-Mart is recording everything you do in their store, including what you do and do not scan. They set the value to it all, so they can calculate down to the penny the moment that your thefts amount to grand larceny instead of petty larceny. They’ve got every piece of evidence the state would need to try to convict on the felony instead of the misdemeanor. Seems like a slam-dunk for both parties: the cops aren’t getting their time wasted responding to calls about $5 in asparagus, and Wal-Mart isn’t getting this exact bad press written about them.

    • Awooooooga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It’s insane to me as a Canadian that thc is a controlled substance elsewhere. It’s been legal ten years here and has caused literally zero problems.