• Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I agree with you, the Democrats aren’t going to reform anything, even if they wanted to (and they don’t).

    A financial collapse seems inevitable at this point, Balkanization may be a very good thing. There’s no need for a civil war, we’re nicely divided already and have functioning state governments that will quickly replace the Federals. That’s best case scenario.

    Worst case scenario? Civil War II, but really, “The South” has even less of a chance of winning now. This seems unlikely. Best to just cut them off and stop propping up their miserable states, within a generation or two they will learn that they need us (coastal cities) far more than we need them.

    Jesus isn’t going to come save the day, no matter what The Christian Broadcasting Network says.

  • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    I would vote for a candidate that begins the process of devolving the Union so we can eventually divorce into separate countries. I think we are doomed for civil war either way. As a Californian, when they’re doing stuff like systematically disenfranchising us, withholding our Medicaid dollars and attacking our public universities despite us contributing more to the treasury than we take back, it’s hard to feel like an American. I’d prefer to be a citizen of California than share a country with these freaks. Winning elections won’t make me feel any better after seeing how they despise and want to destroy us.

  • tamal3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    This is related to why I’m so nervous about teaching social studies next year. Can anyone help me think about how to teach US history without shoving a bunch of propaganda down middle school throats?

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    I’ve always believed that we were living through the collapse of the American Hegemony, but I could never describe the system until I read about the Imperial Boomerang and the Five Phase Lifecycle which captures the US’ expansionist policies post WW2. Except we never needed war, we had the petrodollar.

    The problem when you have a system that centralized, you have one major factor, and then the inability to grow leads to the empire turning within with its expansionist policies towards its people. Its the perfect system to have an incompetent boob turn cruel. And once that happens, everyone senses something wicked on the horizon. Soft power with allies completely vanishes. New allegiances are forged. A new hyperpower emerges. And the most defensive behavior is to protect your own interests – which accelerate the inevitable collapse.

    The US is a very big country, and any future shape will have it more like a confederation – either officially in its successor states, or more likely by Balkanization. Whether or not its the New America we want, well, I’m not that clairvoyant.

    I hope this makes sense, I’m not a political expert. All I am certain of, in my gut, is that Trump is the final manifestation of the decline phase, and this is the final act. The Roman empire went through many drastic ‘collapses’ in its span, this doesn’t mark the end of America, but of the current post-WW2 hegemony? The one driven by the GI Bill and Technological progress? We aren’t coming back from this.

  • citizenAlex@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    There won’t be real reforms from Democrats because they’re complicit and invested in the system staying exactly as it is. Just “nicer.”

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Noooooooooo! STOP SAYING THIS! YOU’RE GOING TO MAKE THE REPUBLICANS WIN!!!

      STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOP! THIS IS WHY KAMALA LOST!

      SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP!

      I have traced your IP Address and confirmed you are a Russian Bot! MODS! MODS! BAN THIS ACCOUNT!

      • citizenAlex@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You must be bad at tracing IP addresses because I’m not a Russian bot. And the Democrats have ALREADY made the Republicans win, in case you haven’t noticed. I’m pointing out that political parties are a corruption of our politics and should not have direct electoral access. They should be like any other special interest group.

      • cotus@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I honestly can’t tell if you’re joking but Kamala lost because her policies were fascism light instead of anything representing the working class. If the Dems want working people’s vote they have to do something for them, not just say “I’m not Trump”.

        I voted blue but completely get why people wouldn’t, lessor of two evils is still evil. If the only thing a system has to offer is evil then it’s time for that system to collapse, simple as that

        • citizenAlex@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I couldn’t tell either.

          We need to work to change the system. Ranked choice voting, nonpartisan elections and legislatures, etc. Oh, and money isn’t speech. It’s power.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Kamala lost because her policies were fascism light

          Okay, but that’s better than fascism, right? So stop criticizing fascism lite! It’s only hurting the opponents of fascism!

          Well… okay, maybe the police and prosecutors that Kamala Harris organized during her time as California AG hurt the opponents of fascism a bit more. But that was before we had a dang Cheeto in the White House. So, let bygones be bygones and focus on the future.

          I voted blue but completely get why people wouldn’t

          I will be very angry at you anyway. If you upset even a single independent voter on the fence about voting for Kamala, you have committed Word Crime against the cause of the Stopping Trump.

          lessor of two evils is still evil

          That’s exactly what a Russian would say. I’ve outed you as a nefarious FSB superagent here to bring down American Democracy and turn us into a nightmare hellscape of Soviet Style Communism, which is what Russia is right now.

    • Mossheart@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Exactly. The current system of government isn’t democracy, it’s competitive authoritarianism.

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    Revolution is necessary, because the bourgeois state cannot be dismantled and a proletarian state put in place via peaceful means.

      • DragonAce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hence the supreme court decision and the mad rush to gerrymander the fuck out of every state they can.

          • TiredTiger@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            While that’s true, I do think that neither of those camps is willing to so much as slide back into a welfare state (even with extra imperialism on the side). The DNC doesn’t want any more Mamdanis (even though he’s a socdem at best), and if they think this’ll prevent that, they’ll let it happen, no matter how much they claim to oppose it. If there were any possibility of an actual socialist being elected, we’d see way worse than this.

              • citizenAlex@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                We should make room for for third and fourth party candidates wherever we can. There are states that implement nonpartisan elections in some ways. Nebraska has a unicameral, nonpartisan legislature.

              • TiredTiger@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                I think you may be right. I just hope we can get them to move left instead of right. Nate Bear’s recent post really gave me pause, because I know a lot of people who want to maintain their treats above all else. I want to have some faith in humanity, but we’re definitely going to have our work cut out for us, I think.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think the United States as we knew it is dying. I feel no kinship with the MAGA nor the Epstein Class, my desire to be kind and fair towards that lot has long since evaporated. Odds are, many folks in Tennessee and Minneapolis feel the same.

  • folaht@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The US has to go through the process of fascism only to be conquered or overthrown by socialists, something that didn’t happen during the Interbellum or world war II.
    Last time they went social democratic to preserve capitalism as US socialists were already drawing their pitchforks.
    This time around however, the capitalists want to hold onto power even as their capitalist society is on the brink of collapsing. This time, like last time in Nazi Germany, the US merchants refuse to take any concessions during a crisis, so fascism it has already chosen.
    This means the US is already going through a painful transition as fascism is known to be a unstable and (self-)destructive form of governance.

    But what is fascism? I have my own take on it and on socialism by the way…

    Here you see a table I made that lists all the standard socio-economic forms of governance.
    All standard have three sets of people called estates.
    The First estate sets the rules, second estate sets the direction of society and the third estate keeps the gears of society running.
    This differs I think from the usual socialist picture (correct if I’m wrong) where Marx had in mind that all estates would become one.
    It also differs I think from what capitalists think of themselves, because merchants are not mentioned anywhere in the constitution, are not in the government or anywhere in the trias politica and yet they get first row seats in inaugerations and VIP invitations during delegations.

    To me, fascism is capitalism, but with a ruling class so powerful that the legitimizer (if that’s a word, I make up words) class has become insignificant and with the first estate gone, the ruling class reigns with impunity.

    It will collapse and when it does, we will enter a world with a majority of socialist states very soon.
    If not, the world will go straight to communism.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      programmers perform labor tho, and rely on physical supply chains (computers, data centers, networks, keyboards, chairs, screens) to do their labor.

      programmers also cannot operate without collaboration and cannot bring their labor to market for a return without payment processing, publishers, distribution networks and marketing.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        24 hours ago

        outside of this construct from the person you’re responding to; programmers are the probably the most modern adaptation of labor aristocracy.

        this means that, yes, they’re working class and are just and interdependent like everyone else is in the working class; but they don’t align themselves with the working class and instead chose to align themselves with the ruling class.

        i think that’s why the person you’re responding to classifies them a “first estate” because the french revolution had these estates and this person is trying to draw a parallel to that revolution.

  • Squidious@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Democrats so rarely have full control of the executive and legislative branches, and when they do it is by such slim margins that the most right-leaning Democrat has the whole thing by the balls.

    Looks at Obama’s Presidency: Democrats had a single vote margin in the House for only 41 days. That single vote was an Independent (Joe Lieberman). We would have had single payer health care if not for him. What we got disappointing but it was a lot better than nothing. Outside of those 41 days everything had to be a compromise with the Republicans.

    I think we need to stop the “both sides are the same” stuff until we’ve actually given the Democrats a big margin in both houses for an extended period so that we give the left leaning members an opportunity to get some things moving.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      “how can you expect us to do anything when we barely even control the entire government. You have to deliver us a permanent one party state and we’ll talk about making some changes in a few decades”

      Funny how that’s never an issue for Republicans

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      this is just an excuse; republicans have no such issues when they have a narrow majority themselves.

    • BillMangionee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think we need to stop the “both sides are the same” stuff until we’ve actually given the Democrats a big margin in both houses for an extended period so that we give the left leaning members an opportunity to get some things moving.

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH LOLLLLLL XDDDD

      “How many times do we gotta teach you this lesson old man?”

    • TiredTiger@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      American politics is kayfabe. If it hadn’t been Lieberman, it would’ve just been someone else.

    • weeeeum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Problem is that waiting, hoping and praying for a Democrat super majority is the exact fallacy they want you to believe. “Put down those pitchforks and torches, you just gotta wait until the good guys win the presidential election, the house, the Senate, the DOJ, AND they aren’t a conservative in disguise that vetos or votes against whatever the Democrats are currently working towards”

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      The rule for needing 60 votes is set by a vote of 50.

      I think we need to stop the “both sides are the same” stuff until we’ve actually given the Democrats a big margin in both houses for an extended period

      Are you thinking on the scale of hundreds of years? To get back to FDR…?

  • ReptilianCleric@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m afraid the rot has spread much farther than that. Yes, without a violent upheaval of some sort, the U.S. is fucked but the problem had long since broken containment…

    In the Borderlands in-game universe, there’s references to historical “corporate wars”, when the corporations seized political power and promptly began to duke it out to see who was going to be on top of the pile. At least that’s how I imagine it in my head. But fuck if it doesn’t look like that’s the most likely future coming our way.

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    You aren’t the only one, this has been the rhetoric from the far right for over a decade now. The “Boogaloo Boys” were named for what they forsaw as “Civil War 2: Electric Boogaloo”. They gained notoriety during Trump’s first term, and later rebranded/forked into the Proud Boys. Now you don’t hear about any of them as much because they’re all hired as ICE agents, military, or working for Hegseth at the Pentagon.

    The thing to recognize is, while we’re all flirting with the idea that maybe, if we’re not careful, we might see a civil war in the US’ future, the Trump administration is talking and behaving like we’re already in phase 1: determining allegiances and positioning forces.

    The trump administration has a lot of factions involved with a lot of different long-term goals, but right now their common goal is to dismantle the US, and they are currently on track. If at some point one or more states decide the only way to put a stop to unconstitutional federal action is through force, they’ll use the military to “keep the peace”. But that will be the tipping point, and they’ve been preparing for a while…

    • freagle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      What leads you to the belief that the elite have a common goal of dismantling the US?

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        First off, I’m not a fan of the fuzzy term “elite”, but I’ll assume we both know what that refers to.

        People think the rich just like to get richer, that Musk and Bezos are competing to have the biggest number in their bank account. But no, they have no interest in “USD”, they don’t care about being crowned “richest person on the playground”, they want to own the playground. They don’t want to be confined by some government’s laws. After a certain point, the only reason to keep accruing wealth is to one day become the government and write your own laws. To me, that goal IS what makes someone “elite”. Conversely, a wealthy person who welcomes high taxes on the rich because it makes the society around them better is still wealthy, but not “elite”.

        The elite are always looking for a route to absolute power, and they all see the Trump administration as an opening and are all jumping at it. The only thing they have in common is they want the US govt to be weakened beyond repair, but where they differ is they all want to be the one to take its place (or retain a position of influence like Little Finger).

        • freagle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Got it. We generally agree on the elite motivation. But I think we disagree on government.

          For me, bourgeois government is the structure of collaboration between and among the elite, not a separate entity. So I don’t think Musk wants to dismantle the US government, he is playing the game between and among other elites and the field of play is the government that represents the collaboration. In so far as the government limits the power of the elite, it generally does so with the consent of the elite. The problem is that the laws remain even though the state of play changes. The system designed by and for the robber barons of the gilded age didn’t work for the entrepreneurial 1950s and the system of the 1950s didn’t work for the financial transformation of the 1980s and the regulation of the 1980s didn’t work for the tech revolution. None of these were dismantlings of the US but reformations of the system from the old state made by the old elites for the old conditions into a new state by the new elites for the new conditions.

          They fundamentally want the US to continue. It gives them a military, a way to repress the masses, access to massive natural resources, a reliable money spigot, and dominating power globally. They don’t want to dismantle it. They just need to reconfigure the machine collaboratively to maximize their power.

          • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            The difference in what we’re saying is semantic.

            They fundamentally want the US to continue

            If this means a government “of the people, for the people, by the people” that maintains a monopoly on violence to ensure no one is above the law/Constitution, then I disagree.

            If this means a puppet state that the “elite” holds oligarchal control over, but maintain whatever facade of democracy they need to, then I agree. But I would not call that the US govt. You could say that because they call it the “US Govt” it’s still the US govt, and you could say that because they call it the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, it’s a democratic republic. But I would disagree on both points.

            Yeah obviously they’re not going to personally crown themselves as supreme ruler on a towering citadel constructed where the whitehouse once stood like a caricature of a villain. But if the structure of “government” that we end up with is completely powerless against them, then it’s objectively not the US anymore; it’s just the “elite”, the govt is whatever they say, they are the govt, wealth only flows wherever they say it’s allowed to in order to maintain power.

            And that’s always their goal, to become the govt, that’s what I mean.

            • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              If this means a government “of the people, for the people, by the people” that maintains a monopoly on violence to ensure no one is above the law/Constitution, then I disagree.

              Given that the US was never that, obviously that isn’t what it means.

              If this means a puppet state that the “elite” holds oligarchal control over, but maintain whatever facade of democracy they need to, then I agree. But I would not call that the US govt.

              Incredible. No notes.

              But if the structure of “government” that we end up with is completely powerless against them, then it’s objectively not the US anymore

              Fucking incredible

            • freagle@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s always been an oligarchy. At no point were the masses in charge of the US. It was founded by rich, landed gentry from Europe leading the common man to battle under the banner of liberal values, but they formed the entire government to be by of and for the land owners. They even gave MORE power to land owners who also owned people. That’s how committed they were to oligarchy from the beginning. It’s always been a structure by which the elite manage their affairs including how best to prevent a revolt by the masses.

                • freagle@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I don’t waste time telling people how to vote. Electoralism is a total waste of time. I vote how I vote, keep it to myself, and spend the rest of my time not thinking about electoralism. None of these politicians deserve my free labor when 100+ Democrats just voted to expand ICE and DHS power to obtain consumer data from retail companies to use in their operation. I put my labor into deconstructing white-supremacist patriarchal capitalism in the hearts and minds of my people in my neighborhood and online, and when I do put in physical effort equivalent to door knocking, it’s doing food distribution for the people around me who need food.

                  Go ahead. Vote in the midterms. The Ds in the house just proved to you that they’re onboard with the whole fascist panopticon policing program. They’ve always been collaborators with the Rs. But vote. It’s literally the least you can do. Don’t let anyone stop you. And then, forget about elections immediately after and do something about the fact that your neighbors, their kids, and their teachers are all replicating the white supremacy myths of this country into every single generation and glossing over it all with a simple “vote for the good guys and bad things are because of the bad guys” narrative.

                • TiredTiger@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  The bourgeoisie will not allow their power to be voted away. There’s a reason the choices in the voting booth are always so narrow; you’re only allowed to vote for a candidate that they’ve pre-approved and bankrolled. Vote or don’t, it doesn’t actually matter.

                  you could say the same of every democracy that has ever existed, and yet they did (and do) exist.

                  I have a feeling we would disagree as to which countries are actually democracies.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    3 days ago

    Democrats have no intention of changing anything meaningful. We learned that when Obama had a supermajority and became a black Dubya, despite his extravagant progressive promises.

    Our only power is local now, and they know this, which is why they swift-boated Mamdani and ran a Democratic partisan against him.

    Yes, it will take a major disruption to necessitate any meaningful change at the national level.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 days ago

      Correct to answer OP, yes you can’t vote your way out of fascism. So we will need a war to get out of this mess.

      Then to the Democrats the current Democratic Party is already right of Regan. It’s that racket effect. Fuck up part if things keep going as business as usual. Then your next major Democratic candidates will be no different then Trump.

      But all that moot. Again we can’t vote our way out of this nightmare. And before 2030 we will all be living in hell run by oligarchy tecno bros. With all the AI data center sucking up all our water and they rounded up as much of the population that they can. Then it over.

      You think North Korea is bad wait until we are living in just that type of world in America were statues of Trump liter the country and anybody that doesn’t worship him is locked in a work camp.