gigaqps@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 20 hours agoEmpirical datalemmy.worldimagemessage-square38linkfedilinkarrow-up1589
arrow-up1589imageEmpirical datalemmy.worldgigaqps@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 20 hours agomessage-square38linkfedilink
minus-squareSubArcticTundra@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up32·20 hours agoLeft is better because the poop hole is outside if the trousers
minus-squareSeductiveTortoise@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·16 hours agoYou’re making a good argument here.
minus-squareSeth Taylor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·15 hours agoOoooooh, this trend makes so much more sense now
minus-squareMBech@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up15·20 hours agoBut also doesn’t cover up the genitals, which is my main reason for ever even wearing pants.
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up5·15 hours agoNot warmth and protection from thorny branches?
minus-squareMBech@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 hours agoI’m not some manly bushman traversing the wilderness on my daily journey to the office. I just don’t want Dorothy from HR on my ass…
minus-squareAmerica@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up10·19 hours agoThey trapped his member but maintained the freedom of his testicles. This is the future that liberals want
minus-squareMongostein@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·19 hours agoI propose a 3rd option: a pair of pants for front and back legs. A male dog wouldn’t be able to pee in those.
minus-squareGloriousGasHole@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·16 hours agoI feel like that defeats the purpose of pants though. If it’s cold outside, I want to keep the McNuggets warm. I’m now picturing what it might be like if we all walked around in pants where the only parts exposed were the front and our butt hole.
minus-squareI_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·16 hours agoThey make those for potty training. https://tinyundies.com/products/tiny-chaps-baby-chaps-split-pants-for-elimination-communication?srsltid=AU7gw4WmS_hOkg2fPFnPhzjUWtL-4MtXb8NfNlXvVn-bzMf79Pmaktbv
minus-squareMongostein@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·16 hours agoFor a human yes, but dogs loooooove to pee on stuff, even in the winter
minus-square[deleted]@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·20 hours agoPlus the tail can wag freely!
Left is better because the poop hole is outside if the trousers
You’re making a good argument here.
Ooooooh, this trend makes so much more sense now
But also doesn’t cover up the genitals, which is my main reason for ever even wearing pants.
Not warmth and protection from thorny branches?
I’m not some manly bushman traversing the wilderness on my daily journey to the office. I just don’t want Dorothy from HR on my ass…
They trapped his member but maintained the freedom of his testicles. This is the future that liberals want
You assume he still has his testicles…
I propose a 3rd option: a pair of pants for front and back legs. A male dog wouldn’t be able to pee in those.
I feel like that defeats the purpose of pants though. If it’s cold outside, I want to keep the McNuggets warm.
I’m now picturing what it might be like if we all walked around in pants where the only parts exposed were the front and our butt hole.
They make those for potty training.
https://tinyundies.com/products/tiny-chaps-baby-chaps-split-pants-for-elimination-communication?srsltid=AU7gw4WmS_hOkg2fPFnPhzjUWtL-4MtXb8NfNlXvVn-bzMf79Pmaktbv
For a human yes, but dogs loooooove to pee on stuff, even in the winter
Plus the tail can wag freely!