How bad do we let things get? Should we wait until the planet can’t sustain life anymore? Should we wait until it’s 100 degrees F in the Artic? Until wildfires blanket entire continents or the last glacier is gone? Should we wait until fascist billionaires take even more from us? Until there are Flock cameras at every mail box? Maybe we should wait until the wells run dry or the tornadoes never stop. When is it going to be enough? I’m so tired of seeing things getting worse. Every. Single. Day. I’m ready. I’ve been ready. How about you?

How do we coordinate? How do we look after each other? What is the signal? If we don’t work together then we are just continuing our slow march to destruction to the drum of the parasitic billionaires. Please, for us, for the cats, the dogs, the birds and trees. The fish and the whales, the beatles and the centipedes. Please tell me it’s worth it to you, that you’re willing to get uncomfortable, that you’re willing to fight. There are more of us than them, and we are rapidly running out of time to make that mean something.

  • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Which IMO is going to happen in the USA before 2028. Their dependance on food imports and climate change interrupting the food supply is only half of it. The other half is that they’ve isolated themselves economically both trade and labour wise.

    • Nora (She/Her)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The US is one of the biggest exporters of food in the world and while it would definitely change what we eat and when, the idea that the bread runs out anytime soon is actually insane nonsense. 2038, fucking maybe. But in a little over a year? We’d need multiple blights and animal plagues that sweep across the country killing everything, and that’s more of a “global apocalypse” scenario. And yes global warming bad but also, the US has a lot of land and like 90% of it is not in use. There will be places to farm, even if the place changes.

      I think a more realistic prediction is like… 2045-2060 and honestly, I’m not sure it’ll matter much.

      • kingofras@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        90% is not in use for a reason. Even if 5% can still be started for agriculture, nature doesn’t instant-produce food. Field cultivation often takes multiple years.

        You’re forgetting the US is no longer a democracy. This is the last emperor on the throne right now, running a kleptocracy to the tune of billions. To keep control he installed the certifiable most incompetent people in his ‘cabinet’. None of these care about the country or its people.

        They were installed by a foreign influence and their job is to dismantle the country. This level of burocratic incompetence will reign till the end of the nation, probably in less than 10 years.

        2045 is bad for the entire world, the US will be far sooner.

        They are an insanely divided nation in the middle of an empire level collapse. They are a violent people. Their civil war which has started with ICE wil only get worse, their oilgargy only making life less tennable for so many.

        You will have riots and strikes, and essentially just people shooting each other. It’s already happening but tuned out of the media for now. But it’ll get worse, and at some point a prolific tiktoker or youtuber will livestream something nearby and that will be an accelerator.

        There are already thousands of americans that have to choose between getting medical care or food. Thousands more that have to choose between feeding themselves or their children.

        There is no scenario in which the USA survives the next 10 years.

        • Nora (She/Her)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I’m sorry but, this is all so fucking unrealistic and doomer its unreal.

          First of all, I live in the US. I have seen ICE and how communities comes together first hand. Fuck off with this “Americans are violent people” rhetoric.

          I’m not saying its gonna be sunshine and roses, but the scenarios you are describing are functionally impossible to occur without genuine global cataclysm and then we have bigger things to worry about.

          “There’s no scenario in which the us survives the next 10 years.”

          democracy in the us? sure, maybe, arguably its already gone.

          the us itself? Of course it’ll be around in ten years lmfao?? Things would have to get so much worse in the next 10 years it would break records on how fast nations collapse.

          These are insane predictions that have no historical or factual basis for why they would happen at the speed you suggest.

          • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Yeah my guy can’t even spell bureaucrat or oligarchy, I don’t think political science is their forte.

          • kingofras@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Being in the US isn’t giving you better data, if anything it makes you emotionally attached and blind to the obvious. Humans are the same. We often know our friends a lot better than they know themselves. I understand you don’t want this to happen, but not wanting it doesn’t mean it won’t happen.

            There is massive historic precedence. The roman empire to name one. Except never before has an empire collapse overlapped with the fastest recorded ecocide and environmental collapse.

            You may not be aware of all the datasets I’m aware of. It sounds like doomer, but it is data based so it unfortunately just is doom. Hard to grasp, I know, it’s why people with terminal illnesses also stay around as long as possible.

            The USA will be there in 10 years, but it won’t be called that, and won’t have any of the respect and glory it still has some of today. It’s not a country. It’s more like a european union that falls apart as soon as things start getting tough. Your very demented pedophile president is personally directing FEMA to withhold disaster relief to blue states. That can’t last another 10 years, let alone 5. Not with the disasters scheduled in the next 3 years. States will simple secede from the union, and as resources will be scarce, war will be inevitable.

            Never before in history has the ruling empire by both capital and military might waged a war against it’s own people, whilst very carelessly trying to light a match to the middle east and south america and soon parts of europe, whilst also diplomatically and economically alienate all its former allies with erratic tariffs, whilst ignoring both its own domestic rule of law as well as the international one. Smarter dictators started wars with foreign nations as a way to unify their people and bolster nationalism, this regime is only trying to make the oligarchs who installed it wealthier.

            10 years is a short time for a nation to collapse, true. But you didn’t start collapsing today either, my American friend. I wish you all the best.

    • Barley_Man@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Dependence on food imports? The US is a large net food exporter. And will remain so for a long time. Especially in wheat, corn and soy beans. Harvesting grains is incredibly labour efficient. The labour crisis is mostly in fruits and vegetables which are very labor intensive. Even if soy and grain yields would be unexpectedly badly impacted by climate change it will first impact the exports and lastly animal feed and agro ethanol. The yields would have to be unrealistically devastated for it to lead to shortages in human food like bread. So at worst we are looking at a shortage of meat, fruits and vegetables but we are extremely far away from any situation involving starvation. This also includes Canada, the EU and Australia. And it’s not all vegetables either. Potatoes, carrots, peas and onions are machine harvested and won’t get affected by a farm labour crisis and will continue to be available. No one is gonna starve for having to substitute broccoli and asparagus with carrots and peas. No one is going to starve when fruits gets expensive either, they are healthy but you can live without them.

      It’s the part of the third world which currently relies on western food exports that will have food insecurity in a worsening climate crisis. The west is at worst facing a more boring and monotone diet.

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The west is at worst facing a more boring and monotone diet.

        That sounds like plenty of reason to start a riot!

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I’ve been ready to riot since 2004. That’s when they changed the fries at McDonalds. Now they suck.

          pitchfork ready

          • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Hot take: McDonald’s fries are trash. Sure, I’ll eat them, but every other fast food place has better fries.

    • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I think you underestimate how much some countries are willing to support having a positive relationship with the US in spite of it being in their best interest to do otherwise.

      • YourAvgMortal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Only as long as the US has something to offer in return, but the Chinese are gaining ground in a lot of countries

    • fitgse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I agree. But it’ll come due to drought and the fact that Trump screwed over farmers with soy exports, which is an important cover crop for crop rotation.

      If farmers can’t make money on soy, they’ll take shortcuts, which will rob the soil of nutrients. That with drought will lead to another dust bowl that will be devastating.

      • Barley_Man@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Soy fixes nitrogen and doesn’t affect the rest of the nutrients. Without soy in the crop rotation you have to simply buy more nitrogen fertilizer for the subsequent crop, which will make it more expensive to grow. Soy is good but it’s not a looming disaster without it. The EU barely grows soy and is doing fine. And regarding dust bowl. Those areas of the US have already switched from plowing to no-till decades ago. Another dust bowl is unlikely even with drought because of it.