Murdering 25% of your entire population and enslaving the rest to work the fields doesn’t really fit into the definition of communism, as far as I’m aware.
They do not care about implementing communism genuinely, it’s a propaganda tactic, you are aware politicians lie, right? This is akin to saying “I’m in the party of building an egalitarian utopia!” And then immediately enslaving half the population. Then you announce actually utopia is bad because this guy is bad. You would have to be an incredible fool to take their word for it and not look at their actions. To think that you think this is an anticommunist gotcha and not a clear case of lying to the public is embarrassing on your part.
Murdering 25% of your entire population and enslaving the rest to work the fields doesn’t really fit into the definition of communism, as far as I’m aware.
and killing thier “closest” allies people they had to invade the country.
Really?
A stateless, classless, currencyless society in which the workers own the means of production.
where does it fit?
What do you mean?
That’s literally the definition of communism. Where does enslaving people make sense? It contradicts with “classless” no?
I thought communism had slaves?
Literally the opposite of the definition laid out by marx but I think you’re trying to be funny and failing
What was Pol Pot’s official title? General Secretary of the Communist Party of Kampuchea. Right?
They do not care about implementing communism genuinely, it’s a propaganda tactic, you are aware politicians lie, right? This is akin to saying “I’m in the party of building an egalitarian utopia!” And then immediately enslaving half the population. Then you announce actually utopia is bad because this guy is bad. You would have to be an incredible fool to take their word for it and not look at their actions. To think that you think this is an anticommunist gotcha and not a clear case of lying to the public is embarrassing on your part.