They say debian is free and has its promise, but Arch has like 2-4 maintainers?

  • Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Your logic seems sound, yup.

    Though broader than the issue you’re responding to, the bigger quality of note in Ubuntu, is not that it’s slow (nor larger), but instead, the most issue of ubuntu, is that they’re very very silly. More marketing silly than sensible development.

    Better Ubuntu be slow than fast anyway. See what they do when they try go fast? Like replacing the userland with rust…

    That’s beyond just “ready or not, here it comes” release model madness.

    It’s silly.