VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to The Trump-Epstein Files™@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoAll to protect pedophilesdiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square132linkfedilinkarrow-up11.37K
arrow-up11.37KimageAll to protect pedophilesdiscuss.onlineVetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to The Trump-Epstein Files™@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square132linkfedilink
minus-squareTrickDacy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up37·4 days agoThis is basically the dumbest way imaginable to move away from oil though.
minus-squareGorgritch_Umie_Killa@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up51·4 days agoTried the smart ways for decades, soooo…
minus-squarecorsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·4 days agoPeople won’t accept a gas tax to fund maintenance and post-oil development, but a war and 110% price hike, sure.
minus-squareGorgritch_Umie_Killa@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoI think we’re talking about a different set of ‘they’
minus-squareBytemeister@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·4 days agoTBF, the only worse option is to not move away from oil at all…
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 days agoYes capitalism is the dumbest system possible. Literally destroying the planet so a few dickheads can ride yachts.
minus-squarecravl@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 days agoOh I agree, 100%. My heart breaks for all the people hurting because of this greedy, gluttonous idiocy. 😔 Nonetheless, sometimes my brain is tired and I don’t have the energy to articulate a more nuanced take. More and more often, in fact.
minus-squareDarkFuture@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 days agoYep. All this way does is hurt the fuck out of anyone that isn’t rich.
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 days agoFor the next few centuries at least, more people will be hurt by climate change. It’s sucks for us now but it’s still a net gain.
minus-squareParlimentOfDoom@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·4 days agoFalse. Things can be both dumb and functional.
minus-squareKrusty@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 days agoI support demand destruction of petrol, period.
minus-squareInputZero@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·4 days agoWould be nice if innocent people didn’t have to be killed to accomplish this.
minus-squarechortle_tortle@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 days agoSure would, but the rich never make it so gentle, so we shouldn’t make it gentle for them.
minus-squareTrickDacy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoSo you’re also happy if it happens with maximal pointless suffering of the working class? …
This is basically the dumbest way imaginable to move away from oil though.
Tried the smart ways for decades, soooo…
People won’t accept a gas tax to fund maintenance and post-oil development, but a war and 110% price hike, sure.
No they didn’t.
I think we’re talking about a different set of ‘they’
TBF, the only worse option is to not move away from oil at all…
Yes capitalism is the dumbest system possible. Literally destroying the planet so a few dickheads can ride yachts.
Oh I agree, 100%. My heart breaks for all the people hurting because of this greedy, gluttonous idiocy. 😔 Nonetheless, sometimes my brain is tired and I don’t have the energy to articulate a more nuanced take. More and more often, in fact.
Yep. All this way does is hurt the fuck out of anyone that isn’t rich.
For the next few centuries at least, more people will be hurt by climate change. It’s sucks for us now but it’s still a net gain.
It’s not dumb if it works.
False. Things can be both dumb and functional.
I support demand destruction of petrol, period.
Would be nice if innocent people didn’t have to be killed to accomplish this.
Sure would, but the rich never make it so gentle, so we shouldn’t make it gentle for them.
So you’re also happy if it happens with maximal pointless suffering of the working class? …
Okay Dwight