Especially as a human can normally consent to death but a pet can’t

  • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Because the talking animals I know tend to prefer “it”. The ones who were unfortunately born in human bodies, I mean.

    And because singular “they” implies personhood, and I don’t want to project personhood onto animals. Instead, I want us to decouple our ethics from personhood and treat non-persons with some level of equality with persons. You shouldn’t need to be a person in order to have rights. Calling animals people just reifies the supremacy of persons, and causes more issues down the line when it comes to the questions of non-persons who aren’t animals, and their rights. Like aliens and AIs.

    • a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Because the talking animals I know tend to prefer “it”. The ones who were unfortunately born in human bodies, I mean.

      If they can talk, they have a human mind. And apparently they have a human body. Idk man kinda just sounds like you’re talking to humans to me

            • a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              Just because its bigoted in one context doesn’t mean its bigoted in every context. Here’s an alternative contextual framing for you: “this is delusional” is also what sane people say to people experiencing delusions (such as, eg, the delusion that you are an animal, or that you are Jesus, or whatever)

              • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 days ago

                The current context is that a layperson with no credentials or experience in psychopathology is handing out medical advice and being a bit of a jerk about it.

                • a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  If someone said “I am literally God” would you need to be a trained psychiatrist to identify that as a delusion? You would not. Same goes here.

                  • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    8 days ago

                    Your reducto ad absurdum has no effect because I respect divinekin and think their identities as deities are valid. It’s kind of a terrible argument because you haven’t explained what’s supposedly wrong about any of these identities, you’ve just pointed at them and gone “LOOK AT THAT! IT’S WEIRD!” and expected Me to agree with you. Pretty weak strategy tbh.