When I first watched The Perfect Neighbor—the one where the Karen kills the neighbor—they showed the kids’ reaction to their dad telling them their mom died. It was on bodycam, and I didn’t feel sad at all. I kind of liked seeing them sad and cry. When the kid said, ‘No, but my heart is broken,’ I rolled my eyes and cringed. Sometimes I go back to watch their reactions for fun. Is this normal? (No, I’m not trolling.)
Edit: And sometimes I just dont care when I see kids or people in pain either way.
They’re probably not going to answer that. But like I said in defence of their previous account (assuming, it’s the same person), they do spark discussion and anyone is free to ignore or block them.
What I see a lot of is people spamming the same article, with the article headline copies and pasted into the subject line and the alt text (so we see it 3x per post), to multiple communities. But you tap their name and all they do is post. They do not engage in discussion. It’s basic karma farming techniques that worked on Reddit, only Lemmy doesn’t have a karma system. Your overall/community score does not raise the value of your posts. So the deal on Reddit was, you did that for a while, then you sold the account and bad actors would use the karma gained to post scams to make their money back. That doesn’t work on Lemmy, so those people are just… I dunno. Littering?
This user/those users may ask questions that aren’t the smartest, but they do create conversation. I think they’re a net positive to the site. Even if their questions are made in bad faith, seeing people come together and post good answers makes Lemmy better, IMO. It’s like Cunningham’s Law states, the best way to get a good answer online isn’t to ask the question, but to confidently post the wrong answer. If you ask the question, people who aren’t sure won’t risk sticking their neck out and having someone come along and gainsay [1] them. However, if you state the wrong answer, those same people will take the time to get the correct answer (it’s the same instinct, for one Internet user to gainsay another). Asking questions in bad faith achieves the same result.
[1] Gainsay is an old, antiquated word that I really think needs to come back, especially in regards to online discourse (or any discourse, really). To gainsay someone is to speak out against them for your own gain. Like you can disagree, you can correct, but if you’re doing either in a way to make yourself look better than them, you’re gainsaying them. Simple word that is almost too obvious in its meaning, yet so specific and IMO we don’t have a better word for it. Trolling covers it, but it covers a lot more.
“Gainsay” is antiquated? Huh.
Yes, it’s largely fallen out of favour in the common vernacular, as in, people generally don’t use it.
There used to be a site (one of the popular dictionaries) that would show you how commonly a word has been used in publications (and, I suppose, online now) over time, but I can’t find it now. It would be interesting to see how less common words rank.
FWIW, I did find a dictionary entry that said it merely means to declare something untrue, with no mention of saying it to gain social status over the person, but that’s how I learned it. Not sure where I picked it up, but if I learned it from a movie or a book, it was being used in that way.
Fair enough. Thank you.