Yeah it’s perfectly fine. And just leaving the signature is too. The discussion is mostly around that one troll actively removing signatures when they exist because “that’s an ad”.
I hadn’t read the discussion but saw there was one and had wondered why anyone would want to remove an artist’s signature. That’s crazy. What a weird world view.
They clearly meant What Women Want, the historically successful movie starring Will Smith as a relationship consultant who drives around the wasteland in his V8 Interceptor.
Wait, why isn’t the author’s name scrubbed off? We’re giving them credit now??? (/s, just in case)
I saw that there was some discussion about this the other day, but this community moves so fast that I didn’t catch all the details.
My unsolicited 0.02 is that crediting in the title or body seems reasonable whenever the artist’s signature/watermark isn’t present.
Yeah it’s perfectly fine. And just leaving the signature is too. The discussion is mostly around that one troll actively removing signatures when they exist because “that’s an ad”.
I hadn’t read the discussion but saw there was one and had wondered why anyone would want to remove an artist’s signature. That’s crazy. What a weird world view.
Ah, that makes sense.
I’m glad it has the name of the comic and the artist visible. I just went to check out some of the comics, they are so cute!
Lower right corner has the signature. This is pre www.
Wow, a comic dated pre World War Wan
They clearly meant What Women Want, the historically successful movie starring Will Smith as a relationship consultant who drives around the wasteland in his V8 Interceptor.
What did Wan do that we went to a World Word with him?
wansmaak en wangedrag
That’s numberwang!