It’s a question. Not even a statement, let alone a lie.
It’s a question designed to look for assumed bias, by flipping the roles of the example to see if the judgement of the situation still holds.
If the judgement fails to hold, it’s likely a biased judgement.
Your unwillingness to engage in the question is a tassit admission of your bias, and your awareness of it. Your disregard for the importance of that bias suggests a sense of superiority. That your opinion supercedes any rules. Can you think of anyone else who shares that kind of confidence?
I assure I wasn’t.
I did in my previous comment. That was intentional, as you kept bringing it up.
But prior to that was a genuine question. An opportunity for you to actually justify and support your view. You could have said “Yes it’s still propaganda.” But instead you seem resigned in your refusal to engage with the idea. So, yah I made some fun and pushed your favorite button.
Should you wish to engage in a constructive discussion. Let me know. I’ll be here.
The thing I quoted was your first reply to me. You realize that right? And then I said that the racism can be implied, because it is. Propagating carnist ideology, which has its roots in racism, is propagating racism. Its why the right chuds love it so much. If you refuse to see that its fine. But denigrating me and contorting words is meaningless. So go for it if you need to feel like The Big Man.
You said it was propaganda because one had big tits and the other was unkempt.
Propaganda. Vegans are weak, unkempt people while carnis have massive voluptuous titties.
I flipped those attributes and asked if would still be propaganda. You then bring up racism for the first time as if it was the only thing you were ever talking about.
It’s a question. Not even a statement, let alone a lie.
It’s a question designed to look for assumed bias, by flipping the roles of the example to see if the judgement of the situation still holds.
If the judgement fails to hold, it’s likely a biased judgement.
Your unwillingness to engage in the question is a tassit admission of your bias, and your awareness of it. Your disregard for the importance of that bias suggests a sense of superiority. That your opinion supercedes any rules. Can you think of anyone else who shares that kind of confidence?
That is a question, and look you asked even more. Heres the definition of sealoining cause you apparently need it https://www.dictionary.com/culture/slang/sealioning
I assure I wasn’t.
I did in my previous comment. That was intentional, as you kept bringing it up.
But prior to that was a genuine question. An opportunity for you to actually justify and support your view. You could have said “Yes it’s still propaganda.” But instead you seem resigned in your refusal to engage with the idea. So, yah I made some fun and pushed your favorite button.
Should you wish to engage in a constructive discussion. Let me know. I’ll be here.
I did answer you.
That wasn’t my real question. The one I asked originally.
The one you just quoted.
You’re still avoiding that one. You could just say yes or no.
I scrolled up through the entire chain so unless you are talking to yourself on the side yes it is.
That’s you quoting me.
Now I’m quoting you, quoting me.
It’s literally my first reply to your original comment. That’s why you called it my opening.
The thing I quoted was your first reply to me. You realize that right? And then I said that the racism can be implied, because it is. Propagating carnist ideology, which has its roots in racism, is propagating racism. Its why the right chuds love it so much. If you refuse to see that its fine. But denigrating me and contorting words is meaningless. So go for it if you need to feel like The Big Man.
That’s what I said.
Which as nothing to do with my question at all.
You said it was propaganda because one had big tits and the other was unkempt.
I flipped those attributes and asked if would still be propaganda. You then bring up racism for the first time as if it was the only thing you were ever talking about.