Why do men date women that’s like height of a children to them?
EDIT: I know reddit banned Jailbait, but can you people move to 4chan and not Lemmy? Fuck anyone who prefers Lolitas, Jailbait, underage looking, petite, child-height or midget if you’re normal height, etc., it’s fucking creepy and you know it. You also know I’m not talking about simply “shorter”, but those cases where it really starts to look off
EDIT2 Why do you people keep talking about men dating shorter women? I’m talking about extreme differences not common ones - whole another level, my GF is 20cm shorter too, that is perfectly normal. Why is it so hard for many to understand what “children-height to them” means?
You have any clue how many women are 6 feet tall? Less than 1%, you are effectively saying tall men should be banned from heterosexual relationships that’s why you are getting yelled at and down voted, I’m 6’2" and most women look like children next to me height wise
Tinder
How the fuck does Tinder increase the number of tall women? Furthermore I am asexual Tinder is the worst place for me to look for a relationship
You can search by height
First of all, “midget” is a slur that shouldn’t be used to describe people with dwarfism and second of all, are you saying that it’s creepy for grown adults to be in a relationship just because one of them has a genetic mutation or happens to be really short? Are little people only supposed to date other little people or is there some magic number where you just become creepy?
c/opisafuckingidiot
Real units please.
They’re both about 0 AU, so I don’t really see the problem.
About 192cm vs 155cm
Use your superior education that you got in your non-US country and do the math. Yeah the units are stupid and Americans are uneducated. But we can at least do the conversions.
But we can at least do the conversions.
And he usually doesn’t need to, since the civilised word is using metric system.
Okay, he was 6’5" and she was 5’2".
He was a skater boy, she said see you later boy
The bf & gf are 1.222x10^35 and 9.842×10^34 planck lengths, respectively.
god i hate the metric system. how much is that in hours?
Maybe if you used the metric system you wouldn’t be in an argument in the first place, avoiding this whole situation.
Their argument was about the optimal date format to use.
Easy. YYYY-MM-DD Z-HH:MM(:SS)
Anything else in inferior.
Everything that doesn’t start with the month is fine for me. This shit is vile!
YYYY-DD-MM? Don’t be ridiculous!
This is only true when dealing with huge amounts electronic data, for easy sorting and such. DD.MM.YYYY is superior for everyday use. Don’t even try to change my mind
DD.MM.YYYY is superior for everyday use
Please elaborate. Can’t see how this could be true in any situation but I’m willing to hear you out xd
If most of the dates you’re looking at are within a reasonably narrow span (say 90 days), DD.MM.YYYY gives you the important information first, and you can often omit the YYYY entirely.
