• DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Why do people eat food they know isn’t good for their health? Why do people continue to buy products from companies that have proven to only sell bad products or engage in scumbag practices?

    They all have the same answer.

      • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Because I live in America and there’s pretty much no public transportation.

        Trust me, if I had a train, I’d fucking use that sucker. Travel into town for my weekly errands AND I don’t have to deal with people not using cruise control on a highway? SIGN ME THE FUCK. UP.

      • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Some of us work multiple part time jobs to barely make it.

        I’d probably stay in the basement if I didn’t need to pay my landed lord their monthly tribute.

        • Num10ck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          buy some cheap sliver of land and park a bus on it. save up and find a better sliver of land and plan from there.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      It turns out in 1961 the American heart Association took bribery money from procter and gamble, who owned and sold “healthier Crisco” cooking oils that weren’t high in saturated fat, like beef and other cooking oils were.

      The AHA then claimed and pushed that saturated fats caused heart disease.

      Problem is, something like 88% of every study done in the past 60 years has found little to no link between heart disease and saturated fats.

      So beef, according to most studies, isn’t bad for you. The AHA was just crooked and on the take, being paid off to sell Crisco.

      Now it is calorie dense and people tend to eat too much of it, but that seems to be a lot of things. Don’t eat too much or you get fat. But apparently, you don’t have to worry about saturated fats being bad for you.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          You seriously comment on a like 2 year old posting to bitch about citations in a comment thread?

          I gave you all the information you’d need to find sources. Go do it yourself, fuckhead.

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        WHO report

        someone else online summarized the genetics part as the following:

        Mandelian randomisation studies show that LDL-c is causative in atherogenic plaques 1 and metabolic ward RCTs show that SFA intakes increase LDL-c, while the decrease in SFAs lead to lower total and LDL-c 2.

        But yes, almost all nutrition science is a bit inconclusive because of genetic variation.

        • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Forgive me, because I’m struggling to understand the linked information, but as someone with atherosclerosis this is an issue close to my heart (ha!).

          I just want to make sure I understand you.

          Your link to the european heart journal says that the causal link between LDL and ASCVD is “unequivocal”.

          I think the WHO study says (amongst a lot of other complicated stuff) that replacing SFAs with PUFAs and MUFAs is more favourable than replacing SFAs with complex carbohydrates? The strong implication being (although I couldn’t see this exactly) that higher SFA intake contributes to heart disease.

          • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I don’t think it tries to compare carbohydrates to any UFAs, but the implication is indeed that SFAs significantly contribute to heart disease.

  • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    This might not be a “stupid” question, but it sure is a loaded and leading one that for sure isn’t in good faith. Welcome to my block list, enjoy your stay.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Because not everyone agrees that it’s terrible for Earth. And even some of those that do may not consider it so terrible for Earth that it’s not worth the tastiness.

    You’re wasting electricity running a computer right now, when we know that electricity generation is terrible for Earth. Why are you doing that?

    • Mugita Sokio@lemmy.todayBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I literally just called the uninformed position of “bad for the earth” out a little bit, and even have an anecdote of my positive personal experience eating meat. I get the sentiment for those who do eat meat, and get bullied just because they want to be healthy (while those who eat plants tend to have a lot of health issues, and can be overwight or obese by refined sugars, gluten, soy, seed oils and/or cow’s milk that’s GMO’d [a correlation some don’t seem to get]).

      Glad to see someone’s on a similar page about it, as that’s just some sort of silly thing to me.

  • Mugita Sokio@lemmy.todayBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    That’s because, if done right and from the right source, certain meats are actually good for the human body.

    Anybody who thinks that heart disease comes from eating meat does not understand that, despite the amount of research on it, meat cannot be considered to be bad for anyone’s health. Those that do have some research on it are going based upon flukes, fraud and lies, likely spread by witches and warlocks. I personally eat organic meat myself, and I have no health issues because of what I eat.

    As they say… “you are what you eat”. Also, I eat meat so vegans and vegetarians can have an easier time not eating meat. In a way, I’m helping them in some sense (as far as I’m aware, but I could be wrong on that).

  • isekaihero@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The USA has abundant farmland and the ability to feed its own citizens with its existing agriculture. Beef is tasty and I’m glad we have so many cows we can eat. If the rest of the world doesn’t like that they are free to eat as many bugs as they want.

  • DBT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Because it’s a damn good source of creatine and protein. And it tastes good.

  • Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Where I live the beef is local and cheap. I’m not able to obtain enough protein without meat, as confirmed by a doctor and a nutritionist when I tried to go vegetarian. With food costs so high it’s cheaper to buy cow than anything else, but when I have the money I opt for fish or turkey. I looked into hunting but it’s prohibitively expensive for me with permits, tags, guns, licenses, days off and transportation. I tried fishing for myself as well, but whenever I get time to do it, there are warnings about eating fish in the area. When there aren’t I never catch anything big enough to legally be allowed to keep. I’d like to get chickens if/when local government ever lifts the bylaws preventing it.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    1 the amount of beef I eat is not a major contributer to the problem. No matter how hard I try. The actual major contributors what to distract people by telling them that they can make the difference. They can’t. 2 I don’t like plants… 3 the way the grow plants for food is also terrible for earth

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The major contributors only sell what people buy. They won’t stop so long as there’s money to be made. And most plants grown for food go to feed animals.

      You don’t like plants because you’re a big baby.

      So yeah, your arguments suck.

    • 3volver@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      No, they don’t. I used to smoke, nicotine is a fucking bitch of a drug, somehow I managed to quit using vaping and nicotine gum over 2 years. Beef is not an addictive chemical. You must never have experienced nicotine drug, what a naive ass comment to make.

  • Akareth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Because:

    • Ruminants like cows repair our depleating topsoil via regenerative farming (our current approach of using petroleum-based fertilisers is not sustainable)
    • A single cow’s life can feed a human for 1 to 2 years, compared to the many incidentally killed animals (insects, rodents, frogs, birds, etc.) during the growing and harvesting of crops, plus the destruction of entire ecosystems to create the mono-crop farms in the first place
    • Humans need to eat lots of fat to be physically and mentally healthy, and beef provides lots of fat (the low-fat high-carbohydrate diets recommended by various agencies — starting with the US’s department of agriculture in the late '70s via the food pyramid — are making us sick, with once-rare diseases such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, depression, and dementia now commonplace)
  • iiGxC@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Because people are selfish, stuck in their ways, and speciesist. Some are also ignorant

  • johnlobo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    because not every country produce beef like you westerner. and not everyone eat beef everyday.

    go make your government ban beef like you ban palm oil if you really care about earth.

    • 3volver@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      go make your government ban beef

      I would get them to end all subsidies for the beef industry if I could. Unfortunately I’m not in control of that, all I can do is bring up discussion, and I got you to comment, so I succeeded.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Along with the other answers:

    Because cooked cowflesh smells delicious, and there are companies out there that are willing to capitalize on that.

    The bigger question is: why do people still drink cows milk? And the answer to that one is all about politics and power.