I have to find my damn calculator from 20 years ago?
Don’t worry, you can buy a new one, but they’re still the same price…
Linux Distro
Windows 11, macOS, and FreeBSD on the list
Wat
Think about it a little more…
A prosperity gospel church is still a church, unless you’re referring to WSL as the equivalent of “Linux”.
I do not consider those churches to be Christian. Their theology is significantly removed from orthoxy that it’s unrecognizable.
But even still, as with WSL, you can find some Christianity in there if you work really hard to find it.
Exhibit 9370 supporting officially renaming the “no true Scotsman” logical fallacy to “no true Christian”
If only Christians centuries ago agreed on a basic statement that could define what is orthodox Christianity…
Wait, ChromeOS was explicitly created to support the institution of chattel slavery? Who knew?!
Sounds about right to me.
It was created by google. That’s not impossible or even particularly improbable
I disagree. You have MacOS as “Spiritual but not Religious”.
MacOS is Hillsong.
Also, many of these are not Christian, and many of these are not Linux.
MacOS is Hillsong.
I can see that.
Also, many of these are not Christian, and many of these are not Linux.
I’m aware.
First up: FreeBSD is NOT a Linux distribution, and secondly, is NetBSD so small that it is nowhere to be found?
Berkeley software distribution ≠ Linux (or gnu+Linux, which is btw not true for all distros.)
That’s part of the joke.
When was Windows 11, Lineage/Android, MacOS or a fucking TI calculator a proper Linux distro
I understand very few of these, except for arch, slack and the bottom row.
How is ope suse and chrome Os related? Are baptist and southern baptist very different?
Arch is the denomination that is super proud of itself, despite being messed up for most people. OpenSuse is Baptist due to it’s general reliability and flexibility. ChromeOS is Southern Baptist because it’s barely recognizable as Linux.
I’ve heard mostly bad things about southern baptists, so I understand why the chrome os. I’m unsure of the relations of baptists and southern baptists.
Evangelicals are typically traditional, very conservative, and proud. I thats a play on the arch user of doing everything in the command line and letting everyone know.
Orthodox is has some nuonsed diffrences to Catholic, but is under a different hierarchy. Not sure how that relates to slackware
The bottem row are all non Christian, so they are aptly not linux.
Orthodox is Slackware because it’s the oldest Christian denomination and changes very slowly.
Wait… Orthodox is the oldest? The Catholic rhetoric is that they are the oldest denomination. I feel bamboozled!
Unitarian UniversalismTo stick to the theme of my chart, since Unitarian Universalism is non-trinitarian it would likely need to be a Unix-like OS that isn’t Linux. I would give it OpenSolaris. (And that’s a compliment.)
I was really proud of a lot of these jokes by the way. Many are multi-layered.
Which I would appreciate … if I had the least idea about Christian sects in the US.
Where does that put Judaism? Just a bare Linux kernel without the rest of the OS?
Judaism is Unix.
Nah Unix should be Zoroastrianism and Judaism should be Minix
That would imply Judaism copied Zoroastrianism’s homework. Since they came around the same time, it would be something else. Zoroastrianism should be AmigaOS. Judaism should be Unix. Would islam be Solaris? Would Wahhabism be Solaris post oracle?
I like reading the comments from people that got the joke.
To be fair Judaism did for the most part copy Zoroastrianisms homework
