We document this phenomenon most clearly in Britain, where the spread of the Beaker complex introduced high levels of steppe-related ancestry and was associated with the replacement of approximately 90% of Britain’s gene pool within a few hundred years, continuing the east-to-west expansion that had brought steppe-related ancestry into central and northern Europe over the previous centuries.
You said it was the largest genocide in European history. I asked you to prove that and you didnt. Your source doesn’t even mention genocide.
They wiped out 90% of the population you plank
Your source doesnt say that either. The part you yourself highlighted says:
steppe-related ancestry and was associated with the replacement of approximately 90% of Britain’s gene pool within a few hundred years.
Genetic replacement doesn’t mean genocide you plank. And it doesnt mean “ThEy WiPeD tHeM oUt!!!” either. That’s why genocide isn’t mentioned anywhere in the article you sourced.
The only plank here is you. You’ve made it very clear that you don’t actually know what genocide means. Genocide has a specific definition. So why don’t you look up what that is before you make a fool of yourself any further?
Colonised by the fictional Beaker Empire that you made up?
No, the beakers wiped out the Neolithic people. Largest European genocide in history.
The Irish are the purest genetic descendants of the Beakers.
Then provide a source that shows that the genocide you made up by the Beaker Empire you made up was larger than the holocaust.
https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/129642
Doesnt say genocide anywhere. And it doesnt say it was larger than the holocaust either.
Congrats. You disproved yourself.
They wiped out 90% of the population you plank
You said it was the largest genocide in European history. I asked you to prove that and you didnt. Your source doesn’t even mention genocide.
Your source doesnt say that either. The part you yourself highlighted says:
Genetic replacement doesn’t mean genocide you plank. And it doesnt mean “ThEy WiPeD tHeM oUt!!!” either. That’s why genocide isn’t mentioned anywhere in the article you sourced.
The only plank here is you. You’ve made it very clear that you don’t actually know what genocide means. Genocide has a specific definition. So why don’t you look up what that is before you make a fool of yourself any further?
What word would you use for the wiping out of 90% of the population lol
Not genocide because it doesnt meet the definitions.
Keep digging holes for yourself.
You made the claim:
Stop dancing around it and prove your claim.
Edit: Im done with you. This is a waste of time. We both know you cant prove your claim and you’re just going to reply with some other nonsense.