Rereading, rereading… Oh, I see it. Yeah that’s an aside to their aside. That wasn’t my core point, or even I think theirs… They were talking about how vegans could make a more compelling case by avoiding “the morality argument” how they already agree with them etc.

I can’t believe that someone who’s clearly thought about the vegan position believes that they want to bring about some kind of “animal genocide” … I feel like I matched their tone pretty well.