RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 11 days agoJust give me someone to vote for who is normallemmy.worldimagemessage-square133linkfedilinkarrow-up1716
arrow-up1716imageJust give me someone to vote for who is normallemmy.worldRestrictedAccount@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 11 days agomessage-square133linkfedilink
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up32·11 days agoNo, the right is also morally and legally corrupt.
minus-squareZkhqrD5o@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·11 days agoMy favourite logical fallacy is this: big, democratic government having control is bad, there’s too little oversight and too much corruption. Therefore, it is better if a billionaire, who rules autocratically without any oversight, is better.
minus-squaredejected_warp_core@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·10 days agoAs long as it’s their autocrat, yes.
No, the right is also morally and legally corrupt.
My favourite logical fallacy is this: big, democratic government having control is bad, there’s too little oversight and too much corruption. Therefore, it is better if a billionaire, who rules autocratically without any oversight, is better.
As long as it’s their autocrat, yes.