• ivn@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          It’s just that cookies are only one tool for tracking. When you accept all you consent to tracking but it doesn’t necessarily use cookies for that tracking.

            • ivn@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              No, they are a necessity for so many things, no doubt about that. They’ve plenty of legitimate uses.

              • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                You can hold anything in a session on the server as 1kb here and there is nothing nowadays

                • ivn@jlai.lu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  And how do you think the session is kept between requests? With a cookie.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Are you trying to suggest that I would be better to just deny the cookies? I don’t know what you’re trying to say by linking to that article.

        Device fingerprinting as a technique it’s pretty easy to defeat. There are plenty of privacy focused browsers that will also include device fingerprinting protection. In fact pretty much any browser that doesn’t store cookies will also do this device fingerprinting protection as well.

        • ivn@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          It’s really hard to know how efficient a device fingerprinting protection is.