• ivn@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        It’s just that cookies are only one tool for tracking. When you accept all you consent to tracking but it doesn’t necessarily use cookies for that tracking.

          • ivn@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            No, they are a necessity for so many things, no doubt about that. They’ve plenty of legitimate uses.

            • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              You can hold anything in a session on the server as 1kb here and there is nothing nowadays

              • ivn@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 days ago

                And how do you think the session is kept between requests? With a cookie.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Are you trying to suggest that I would be better to just deny the cookies? I don’t know what you’re trying to say by linking to that article.

      Device fingerprinting as a technique it’s pretty easy to defeat. There are plenty of privacy focused browsers that will also include device fingerprinting protection. In fact pretty much any browser that doesn’t store cookies will also do this device fingerprinting protection as well.

      • ivn@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        It’s really hard to know how efficient a device fingerprinting protection is.