As a non-native english speaker, your first real sentence very much broke my brain. Good point, tho

Geez, your story is heartbreaking. I wish you and your sister all the best. Also, have you ever thought about emmigrating? I know that many countries do currently experience similar shifts, but I guess the US is leading the polls right now when it comes to living a toxic life under constant pressure. I really wonder why there arent more US americans grabbing all their stuff and their loved ones and leave for a better life. The biggest struggle would be the language barrier, but NZ, AU or CA should still be possible.

Never thought about it this way… especially in the context of slave ownership. Thanks for the new perspective.

Thats a brilliant question. I might be in the minority here, but one thing I’ve always wrestled with is whether ACAB is best understood as a critique of an institution or as a judgment of every individual within that group.

Personally for me, the strongest argument has always been the institutional one. I have deep criticisms or even hatred of how police power is (ab)used, of the historical role in protecting existing power structures, and of the ways in which accountability regularly fails.

At the same time, I’m less convinced that every individual who wears a badge is equally malicious or equally committed to those structures. Some actively reinforce them, some passively uphold them, and some try, with varying degrees of success, to mitigate harm from within. My best friends father is serving as a police officer here in Germany, and he is as left as it gets. He became a cop bc “that’s where the change needs to happen”. He’s openly anti-racist, supports refugees, is active in labor and union issues, has privately attended demonstrations against far-right groups, and has never been shy about criticizing police misconduct, especially if it’s about his very own colleagues.

That’s why the Edward Snowden question is interesting. If someone works within a coercive state institution, but then exposes wrongdoing at enormous personal cost, what does that tell us about the institution? What about the individual?

So I’d say: the police is one of the biggest problems of our societies. Comes right after the fight against climate change and the fight against capitalism. But IMO it’s wrong to say ACAB, because the problem is too complex for such a simple solution. Philosophy says it’s every individuals own action that should decide over their fate. Feel free to argue with me, since I’m open to changing my mind.

Edit: typo

Valid point. Do you have ideas for a better solution?

Im with you. And i think social media didnt stop being social by accident. Once a platform becomes expected to grow forever:

• People stop being the product’s purpose and become a resource to extract value from
• Communities become audiences
• Conversations become content
• Hobbies become enshittified engagement metrics

Id argue that the internet didnt suddenly forget how to be social, but that it was purposfully optimized not to be.

Never thought about it like that. I think the unanimous voting system could really require policy makers to push things in small increments that can easily be overseen and are often hard to decypher. I’ve always seen as unnecessary rigidity. But I guess it really does have its benefits. Thanks for the change in perspective!

If you are into fantasy, then I need to recommend you the books of Brandon Sanderson, especially the Stormlight Archive series. It’s so epic, nothing else comes close

Yeah, people just need to close their eyes and believe that energy crystals is all we need.

Thanks, thats actually a sensible point of view. Calms me down a bit :)

I secretly love you dutchies for your small cities, streets and parking lots. It’s not only cute, but an active fight against US american super-sizing.

Its all good, folks. German politician Beatrix Von Storch (AfD) assured that it’s all just bc the sun sometimes moves closer to the earth, so it gets hotter. In some years, sun will surely move back, right?

Right?

First of all: great thing that you found something that you can be passionate about. Thats worth a lot.

On topic: I am not a native english speaker, so when reading english literature, I prefer sentences that are grammatically and syntactically somewhat well-structured. It becomes much easier for me to read when authors do not rely too heavily on context, but instead ensure that each sentence contains a clear subject, verb, and the necessary objects. Thats the main thing bothering me in your texts The downside is that this can make the writing sound somewhat formal or scientific, which might not be to your liking. So maybe don’t listen to me at all :D

Also, I know many people on here dont like AI, but text handling is exactly what it was made for. With the right prompts, you could analyse your work and look for low-quality-sentences and manually overthink them. Just as an idea.

Thats a measure to intimidate the masses. The US not attacking the NL gov, but it’s civil servants. Everyday normal people like you and me. Yep, thats fucked up.

Veto rights only ever make sense if your group consists of 2-8 people. The larger the group, the more dangerous do veto rights become.

Spain is slowly evolving into europes Giga Chad. Keep this spirit up!

I dont know If you can LARP it, but the Stormlight Archive is a pretty cool fandom. Highly recommend

I am usually very much pro-EU, since I think it is the best project that ever evolved on this continent. But in some cases, I am deeply ashamed of my European supergovernment. This is one of them.

Can someone with more knowledge tell me If there is some hidden strategy?

Nice answer. TY for the in-depth explanation.