We’ve been heading there ever since they put a cap on the number of Congress people. I’d say we’re well past heading though.

Vance said it too. Pushed it way harder actually.

No.

With how subtle you are you might as well work for the FBI.

Certainly not that I’ve seen.

Really have to wonder why these people can’t just you know go find a compound somewhere and make some special Kool-Aid or something. Why do they got to drag the rest of us into it?

I suspect that Peter Thiel is one of these AI rationalists that seem so prevalent in the Bay Area. Or maybe an odd offshoot of them like the zizians. He certainly seems to embody a lot of the tendencies and rhetoric, though with a more evangelical bent.

People who are unfamiliar with these groups are never going to be able to truly grasp the intense psychosis they all exhibit. Behind the Bastards did a brief overview of them in it’s zizians episode that really is just the tip of the iceberg, but it’s not a bad introduction.

Lot cooler when it is though.

I’m not sure if they do. Considering the way the Trump Administration operates it’s very possible they would just declare one and start drafting people. Any lawsuit would take years to happen cuz the Supreme Court would push it back.

Although even if they did have to I’m not sure if that would be an impediment. Every single Republican will vote for whatever he tells them to. So it could pass in the house. As for the Senate if Trump gets rid of the filibuster as he seems primed to do right this moment then it would be easy.

It literally says Americans and mentions Trump by name. Was that not specific?

Probably a good idea to start teaching the young guns about grenading.

Straight to a concentration camp probably.

Why?

Well damn Jackie I can’t control the weather!

For the life of me I can’t understand you why you keep linking the same Wikipedia page to a word nobody is talking about. You’re continually making the argument that the word you is not a second person singular while still using the word you as a second person singular. Thou art utterly absurd. I’m going to block you now.

Okay so your argument is basically that language never changes and never evolves? Because it wasn’t a second person singular 300 years ago it can’t be one today? All right. That seems silly but you do you.

Yeah I’m not understanding your argument either. Are you arguing that “you” is not a second person singular in Modern English? It sounds like you are but then you also are using it currently so I’m confused.

I don’t know about number four my friend. I was going through some of my old CD cases of that long ago and there’s more than a few that I deeply regret.

Yet another engagement title from you I see.