matlag

That would just be a new occurrence of a known pattern: most hateful are mostly repressing themselves and infuriated by people who aren’t.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/homophobes-might-be-hidden-homosexuals/

Actually the reason is the US uses 3M$ anti-missile missiles to intercept 20k$ drones. It was obvious from the start they would run out of them way while Iran would keep producing more of their drones (plus the ones they get from Russia).

It’s quite unbelievable they the US were so confident in their capabilities they didn’t bother to learn anything from the war in Ukraine, where swarms of cheap drones have replaced advanced but costly missiles for years now.

So the money may be genuinely used on weapons (and well, lobsters and steaks…). It’s just spent stupid.

Facebook introduces private messages. They’re private. Ah, no! They sold these messages to Microsoft, Amazon and Huawei! – They trust me, dumbfucks!
Facebook has all interest to work for the benefits of its users. Ah, no! They literally experimented on people to see if they could make them more depressed or more happy. – They trust me, dumbfucsk!
Facebook has an active moderation. Ah, no! They knowingly let disinformation spread and lead to a genocide because engagement numbers were good. – They trust me, dumbfucks!
Instagram minds kids and their sensitivities. Ah, no! They have algorithms to exploit their insecurity because engagement numbers were good, who cares if a few of them end up depressed and kill themselves. – They trust me, dumbfucks!
Whatsapp has E2E because they value privacy. Ah, no! The app sends home a copy of the private key on demand, rendering the whole thing pointless. – They trust me, dumbfucks.

Meta’s glasses would never take a picture without their wearer’s explicit consent.

Fortunately for them, some people are really really really dumbfucks to a point Forrest Gump would look like a genius next to them.

Yeah, I’m totally going to chill because I can’t see a LED… not. Hell yes, I’m still going to call out creep-glass wearers.

Go ahead and test yours. Repeat after each update and check if it’s location and/or time dependent.

If you orientate your phone with cameras towards people, they’ll assume you’re taking pics or filming. Otherwise, it’s a general purpose device.

If you wear creep-glasses designed to secretly take pics or film people, a lot of people will assume you’re secretly taking pics or filming.

I’m wondering if it’s really the vaccine or if what makes you vulnerable to the antivax idea also makes you more prone to neurodegenerescence.

You still fail to understand you don’t need to be continuously filming to monitor what’s going in front of a camera.

You’ll understand when you’ll be surrounded by parents wondering if you’re secretly filming or taking pics of their kids.

You obviously know nothing about fascism.

In this case, the ratio is probably of 100:1 or 1000:1 people in my favor. So if it comes down that, see you outside!

Let’s say hypothetically that he assaults you, you sue him, then he raises 200k$ for his defense through crowdfunding because I bet the majority of people don’t want creeps to record them secretly. You’re still confident in your odds?

When you say “fascist”, you do realize that fascism involves crowd control and these glasses are a dream for a fascist regime? All the speech about “cameras everywhere is ok” falls right in the authoritarianism thinking, that’s just a step from fascism.

It’s absolutely legal to film them as you said, and it is absolutely legal to speak up. If that makes them uncomfortable, that’s entirely their problem, isn’t it?

Nope. These things can certainly take pics regularly and still last.

But everyone here advocating violence seem to have forgotten how to do democracy.

A lot of changes in democracies happen following violent events. Violence is unfortunately one of the very few effective method to raise attention on an issue.

The law hardly change spontaneously.

If you use a Meta smartglass, the “sharing” is out of your control.

It’s actually going to be interesting when a smartglass wearer has to explain a judge they didn’t know it was recording and uploading pictures or videos.

Spot on! https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/03/workers-report-watching-ray-ban-meta-shot-footage-of-people-using-the-bathroom/

He won’t even know he’s doing it. Why would anyone assume wearers have any control on these smartglasses and what they upload?

If I spot one in a public place, and I start filming them while shouting “Are you recording a video right now with these smartglasses?”, I guess that would be totally fine, right? No reason to make them uncomfortable, because they’ll be in their right.