she, her, etc. (for any one or all of us).

plural, and may use both “we” and “i”. it’s complicated, but “i” is most often by the girl amongst us who does a lot of the feeling emotions and other stuff, as she is most often “at front”.

more about that

that girl (we will call her tani) runs much of the show, and does a lot of the feeling and perception, but a lot less thinking. while most thoughts posted are contributed to by multiple of us, tani’s thoughts in particular are again, more emotional. examples: “we love the pretty views” and “i wanna snuggle our plushies so badly”. the former could be shared across many of us, but for the latter, many of us do not do that direct decision making to begin with; really only tani does.

still, others of us may use “i” too!

all pictures photographed by us and published here are under the CC0 1.0 public domain dedication unless otherwise noted

  • 4 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
Cake day: January 1st, 2026
  • kivihiili@lemmy.blahaj.zonetomemes@lemmy.world•woodEnglish
    2·
    3 days ago

    our two cents on this:

    if there are hinges on the rear of the hood, it may just slide up the windscreen, as the screws (or whatever fastener) used to attach them might simply rip out. the planks used as the frame of the hood look to provide a very convenient load path directly towards said hinges, and the not so strong looking mounts they are on. as you said, wood can withstand much compression along the grain, meaning those mounts would be put under very high loads, and probably fail.

    and if those mounts did not fail, the actual sheet of plywood or OSB used isn’t super thick, maybe about three eighths of an inch, or about 10mm if it’s metric? its failure mode would likely involve buckling or it just crumbling into pieces… cars are heavy!

    either way, the windscreen is very strong, and the wood used here is a lot weaker, at least as far as loads on the broad surface go. the most pertinent hazard here seems to be of the hood catching air, flipping up, and obstructing the view of the operator. there do look to be tie-downs here to stop that, but even the non-modified hood of a regular passenger vehicle can absolutely flip up if it is not closed properly! again, the windscreen would likely still protect the occupants, and in the latter case has for many.

    of course, this is all conjecture… much more information would be needed about this setup to come to a decisive conclusion. happy engineering! :)

  • kivihiili@lemmy.blahaj.zonetolinuxmemes@lemmy.world•The MinefieldEnglish
    22·
    13 days ago

    while this is not real, something similar in principal very much was! (but not too widespread)

    see here or look up “casino dos malware”

    uh in short it erases “the disk’s” (unsure which) file allocation table (pretty much the dos/windows version of a superblock). apparently some versions did copy it to memory and give the user a chance though!

  • kivihiili@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•fuck it, just paste your clipboard in the commentsEnglish
    4·
    25 days ago

    ctrl+v: (from a previous post)

    i think it would be more accurate so say that, often, asexuality yearns for the absence of sex, rather than being defined by it.

    middle click: (from a message i sent to my friend on steam i think? no idea how middle click clipboard actually works honestly)

    o meowmaxxing is the PERFECT word
    holy shit i just realized i went to the grocery store wearing a fucking COLLAR
    i am goin gto
    di e
    goodness gracious me
    [2/22/2026, 5:40 PM] [my username]:
    wait i mig

    (if you want a conclusion to the story, i realized that my coat would have completely obscured it and no embarrassment was to be had lol)

  • kivihiili@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•*Permanently Deleted*English
    10·
    25 days ago

    cw: talks a fair bit about sex and my perspective on it

    i sometimes experience a problem myself similar in vain to this.

    as much as i enjoy snuggling and affection and even more “smutty” stuff like breasts, i do not enjoy the prospect of sex. perhaps its some form of gender dysphoria, perhaps its something else, honestly not super sure. all i know is i don’t find sex appealing!! but i’m also not vehemently against it or disgusted by it. i think this article puts it really well:

    i think it would be more accurate so [sic] say that, often, asexuality yearns for the absence of sex, rather than being defined by it.

    with regards to nudity: the only times it actually makes me feel a little uncomfortable is when it is set in a sexual/romantic setting. if someone is at the lake with not as much as a patch of covering on them and just swimming around and having fun, i don’t mind at all. so long as its not sexualized i think nudity is perfectly okay! but, if it is brought into any romance through even just caressing the other’s hair or whatever, it puts me off a little.

    again, i do like this sort of affection, i do absolutely find people attractive. i just enjoy being able to be affectionate or observe it without having to partake in/bear witness to sex!

    however, a marginally decent number of people are seemingly unable to comprehend any this. quite often some people get incredibly confused no matter how much i try and explain this to them. i’ve never really been ridiculed for it thankfully, but it just does not seem to compute in some people’s heads that i am not fond of sex!!

    that aside, this is thankfully one of the better places i’ve seen on the internet, and i’m glad to be here!! regardless i provide you with my best wishes when it comes to fending off the demands of the internet, and my apologies for the ramble :D