ccryx [he/him]

I think there are (at least) two things wrong with the argument:

1. it assumes that there can be no source of absolute morality aside from religion, ignoring centuries if not millennia of moral philosophy/ethics (which at least tries to answer the question seriously).
2. even if nonreligious sources of morality don’t exist, the argument assumes that religion is a source of absolute morality. since conflicting religions exist, the religionness-property alone is not enough to validate religion as a source of absolute morality.

Aktuelle Bundesregierung: halte mein Bier

HLI, dass es wireguard nicht mehr über F-Droid gibt