Tehdastehdas

Exchange problems that you’re sick of, for problems you’re not yet sick of. Move every few years until you’ve become sick of all possible problems. Then you’ll be ready to solve them all.

Moving to a country with a language you can’t read is peaceful because you can’t read ad slogans or yellow paper headlines.

Similarly, not all winos drink wine.

Is the material relevant here? My point is, if the whole roof is covered by panels, you don’t need the redundant roof under the panels anymore.

Everyone’s roof is getting drilled, says the new requirement - I’m suggesting reducing the drilling. Of course the three without installations would compensate the one carrying everything for them.

All houses are linked by the electrical grid already, no new trenches needed.

Seems wasteful not to cover one whole roof with panels (possibly replacing the sheet metal entirely) and connect them to one big inverter to power four homes. Splitting the needed amount of panels and inverters for every house wastes lots of installation work and makes every roof uglier.
Seems wasteful to require solar panels on homes shaded by trees or aligned the wrong way.

This should be done at the EU-level. Of course China can bully us one by one.

EU is shadowbanned on those propaganda platforms.

I like to blame dating sites’ pay-to-play business model incentivising sabotaging good matches to keep the users paying forever. That business model should be banned.

Also this:
“Destruction of OkCupid as an attack against its liberal-skewed user base”
https://lemmy.world/post/24108120