Yeah for fucks sakes lads

That’s why I send “summary” emails, even if the brass tells me not to, for in person discussions

I mean that’s what the instructions say

You’re supposed to spray it in the bowl before you go tho

Agreed, you’re free to soapbox and call me an idiot, and I’m free to call y’all babies

Y’all a bunch of babies. Just block the instance or make your own if you care so much

I mean yeah, i don’t know many people who can just “Read” an entire damn research paper, but usually the abstract is sufficient and taking a look at a few gathered data points. But in my experience, like you said, sometimes the paper just concludes not too strongly one way or another

To be fair, this is A pretty complex thing, you can show facts to some people and if it doesn’t fit their narrative they will not follow, but there are others who are open. What he should have said was okay there is a trend of this but in my personal experience there are people who do not have this issue as well. And that’s not even considering how you approach something, if you come in guns blazing and condescending people will shut you down no matter what facts you have. If you come in understanding and willing to discuss, people are more open to changing their mind. It kind of sounds like op found the two articles didn’t actually read them and considered herself the “winner” on this

My friend had someone in our discord, he was the only one who was on in the video chat, the dude popped in and said, “you wanna see a murder”

“No?”

Then he just vigorously started cutting himself with a knife. He was ultimately kicked out because of his drug problem

Gotta be honest this seems like a shit post comment but I’ve done my rounds, crack is weak sauce