I’m in favor of all that, too.

Plus, we all know that, whatever the theory, a lot of people just want to duck with Muslims.

The men forcing women to dress like this aren’t using the law to force them. Laws forbidding dressing like this are, theoretically, to protect them from being forced.

I’m open to the probability that there are such women. But I can’t imagine that they area anything but a sharp minority.

What about the ones who don’t want to, but are forced into it?

Is that a gun in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

I guess he thinks Trump is about to crash and burn.

Depends. If the chief murdered the guy, then that’s the restaurant’s responsibility for not keeping the chef secured.

Ah, the Wicked Bible, first brought to my attention while reading Good Omens.

Can’t argue with the word of god.

This is an anti-gift.

I agree with you, but no matter has good your training and equipment, you’re taking the chance every time.

As someone pointed out elsewhere in this thread, the same is true of driving to work, which makes OP’s position rather questionable.

This is the worst headline I’ve read all day.

I don’t think he has any beef with firemen, but if your job is to deliberately expose yourself to an incredibly dangerous situation on the regular, death is kind of an expected outcome.

I agree, as far as that goes, but I still feel sorry for them.

I’m on board.

No, that’s the 35th rule.

Rule 34 applies.

No, not that one. Rule of acquisition #34.

Distilling is dangerous is it goes wrong.

Making meth is dangerous even if everything goes right.

I’m curious to know why they are there. They can’t have much in the way of line of sight from there.

The only thing this makes me think is “May I, please?”

Isn’t that the guy that played Unicron?