

No, this is the kimberly-clark fire, this is a reference to that older twitter meme.
Hello! I’m a POC (black/latino) autistic/ADHD dragon from Brazil. My interests are usually gaming and drawing. Reddit refugee after getting banned multiple times for “threatening violence” for standing up against fascism.
Used to be https://lemmy.world/u/SalamenceFury.


No, this is the kimberly-clark fire, this is a reference to that older twitter meme.


If the company was paying this horribly, then maybe it was the better deal for them. Now they can collect unemployment that probably pays more than they did.


The rich forgot that before worker’s rights existed, greedy capitalists who owned factories and treated their workers horribly during the industrial revolutions would either find their factories or their homes burnt down, and themselves beaten to death in front of their own families.
Unions and worker’s rights were the compromise to avoid this from happening. Those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it, and the rich clearly didn’t.


Not a Walmart, but a Kimberly-Clark warehouse as others mentioned. This is more making fun of an old tweet of a liberal essentially saying “leftists will say voting doesn’t work and to instead firebomb a walmart and then they don’t firebomb a walmart”, and this meme was about the irony of something symbolically similar happening. And uh, there’s been four warehouse fires this week counting this one.


No one wants to hear you trying to shut revolutionary action down before it even begins. Stay in your lane. Workers in the late 19th and early 20th century did this all the time every time the boss got too greedy, if not going to their house and beating them to death in front of their family. Worker’s rights only exist because that is the alternative.


This was in Ontario (in Cali), not LA. And either way, I think they’d be fine with higher prices on toilet paper if it means everyone gets paid a living wage.


Correction: The arsonist set some small fires, which triggered the sprinkler systems, which had firefighters come to turn it off and try to prevent water damage.
They then set about 4 bigger fires away from any prying eyes with the sprinklers turned completely off, which spread so fast that the firefighters present declared it a lost cause and called for reinforcements.


They announced they’re moving their entire operation out of CA, lmao.


Yep. The alternative to no unions or worker’s rights is people dragging Jeff Bezos out of his mansion, beating him to death in front of his family, and then burning the house down.
Stop cropping the artist’s signature you clown.
I’m sure you’ll be able to win against full-blown fascism with strongly worded letters. Ask Neville Chamberlain to know how that went.
“it would be better if there were fewer guns”
There are 470 million guns in the US. This conversation is a non-starter. You are not putting that ketchup back in the bottle. Not without causing millions of deaths. It would be exactly what ICE is doing, except everyone’s got guns.
There’s something that most resistance groups know about that is called “winning the narrative”. If you open fire first, it’s easier for the government to justify cracking down on you as a “violent terrorist”.
Ask an aboriginal what they think of the police.
And that’s a justification for rolling over and doing nothing? In the US, armed protests don’t usually get messed with because open carry isn’t illegal everywhere. Hell, Ronnie Reagan banned open carry in California exactly because the Black Panthers were copwatching with guns and the kkkops didn’t like it.
Yeah, now show me one gun law made in the last 26 years that wasn’t made with the explicit idea to only protect liberal white suburbans while at the same time giving exemptions to cops and ex-cops as if they don’t abuse their wives at a 40% rate.
You do, actually. Armed protests don’t get attacked or tear gassed by police. Also, look up the battle of Blair Mountain.
Have you looked at every gun law drafted in the last 20 years? Every single one banning certain classes of guns only targets “assault weapons”, and every time, they have exemptions for cops or ex-cops. Handguns kill significantly more people, but “assault weapons” are scary and make liberal suburbans feel mortal for once so they irrationally hate them.
Cops in America don’t need guns for 90% of the stuff they do, no matter how armed the population is. They’re the actual nutjobs with guns. They’re the ones killing people over getting talked smack back or over a fucking wallet. And even if cops started getting killed from not having guns, so what? THEIR JOB is to sacrifice themselves for the public good. They can just have SWAT at the ready and have unarmed cops do almost everything. You don’t need a fucking gun to radar cars in the highway, write tickets, go to someone’s burgled house to take a note they’ll eventually lose, or bother someone over the position of their stereo knob.
Sir comic security man, I think YOU are the one who needs to be pepper sprayed.