Eat the rich.

  • 0 Posts
  • 43 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2025

help-circle





  • there are better authors who have made those same points without all the fucking reactionary and eco-fascism tied to it.

    Seems like a great reason to discuss Ted’s viewpoints. We should definitely discuss the ineffectual extremists. Compare and contrast. Weigh and measure. That’s what truth-seekers do. Telling people not to read a particular author borders on censorship.

    But asking people to expand their reading list and providing actual recommendations - that is wonderful and commendable. Thank you for that!


  • It’s been 30 years and people are still talking about it. He’d probably consider that a win.


    He predicted that technological advances would lead to extensive and ultimately oppressive forms of human control, including genetic engineering, and that human beings would be adjusted to meet the needs of social systems rather than vice versa.

    Kaczynski stated that technological progress can be stopped, in contrast to the viewpoint of people who he said understand technology’s negative effects yet passively accept technology as inevitable. He called for a revolution to force the collapse of the worldwide technological system, and held a life close to nature, in particular primitivist lifestyles, as an ultimate ideal.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Kaczynski


    He hated leftist views, he hated fascism. He seemed to advocate a technological level somewhere between Native American and Amish. Call him an isolationist libertarian, I suppose. His solution to the problem is like something out of Fight Club - a one man “Project Mayhem.”

    tl;dr: His methodology was pointlessly cruel and ineffective. But his assessment of the human condition wasn’t too far off the mark.






  • I don’t approve of his methods, either.

    Then again, I don’t approve of the Church’s methods, but there’s some pretty good stuff buried in the Christian bible, too.

    Reading something doesn’t mean you need to agree with the author. It’s not like people are financially supporting the Unibomber, or excusing his actions, when they read his manifesto. They’re just studying history.


  • I think scale is the issue.

    Basically, it was legal to rape, murder and/or kidnap Africans. It was so profitable that the main slave dealers were African tribes/nations who would sell their prisoners of war to the slave trade - thus encouraging more war and more slavery.

    Estimates of African deaths (on the low side) are double that of the Holocaust.

    This went on for 400 years. (Nazi power lasted only about 12 years by comparison.)

    And even to this day, the African slave trade is responsible for much of the racism and division we see. So, yeah, slave trade shaped our world in many ways.






  • Would it? Is that the only solution?

    Why do Yemen and Switzerland have such high ownership and no school shootings?

    Don’t get me wrong, less guns would be good for many reasons. And I think we can get there, eventually. But right now, I have zero confidence that our government is fit to enforce any law fairly. Neonazis are openly running the DoD and ICE, this is not the time to dial back the Bill of Rights.