How am I claiming the opposite? I prefer food that is nice to eat. I continue to maintain I prefer food that is nice to eat. I enjoy home-grown tomatoes. I don’t buy supermarket tomatoes because they are not nice to eat.
Did you miss the part where ‘shitty’ is a personal assessment with no objective value? If all you care about is profit margins, then hybrid breeds aren’t shitty, that’s why they use them. But I’m not a person who sells fruit, I’m a person who eats them. Therefore, shitty is a measure of how nice they are to eat.
You are a stranger on the internet. I thought you were asking why a person might consider them shitty, and I answered in good faith. Then you made it obvious you just want to sea lion.
If you think my job is to convince you why you think they’re shitty, that makes no fucking sense, and I’m not going to do that. Your opinions are yours. Enjoy your water balloons.


Lol, well I probably would because I don’t know what that is. And it sounds like an artificial sweetener.
But I get your point. Humans aren’t good at feeling out chronic ‘mundane risk’ and significantly deemphasise it in favour if acute, ‘dramatic risk’.
Much as how 9/11s death toll permanently transformed America politically and culturally on multiple levels, whereas the severity of far greater numbers of vehicular (or firearm) deaths are accepted as unavoidable facts of life.