Hazel

That sounds a bit like borderline.

I’m nothing like a psychologist though, just a possibility :)

Seems like the prongs might get in the way, I’d opt for the tanto one but use it point-down I think.

Furry Po̊rn?

Yeah, it’s about phones because they changed established practice, but then why use a new word for what was established practice and not the ‘new’, phone-specific, practice of limiting app availability?

Before phones that was the only way to install apps though.

Maybe we should have a term for the inverse, like ‘wallgardening’, or ‘bootlocking’, or ‘corputing’, or ‘inshilling’? 🤔

I couldn’t stand Mint Cinnamon, it’s like Linux with all the worst parts of Windows =P

Auth/lib is very cringe 🫠

Well if we’re strictly speaking DnD I guess mine would be Worlds Beyond Number’s main campaign (that’s DnD right?).

But Fun City, Gutter and Unend are my personal favs using other systems :)

I really feel like that’s a misrepresentation, though admittedly I don’t have the data to back it up. To say any theist believes any other theist from another denomination is delusional just seems absurdly reductive.

And maybe it didn’t come across in my other comment, but to think of faith as some ontological disagreement on which particular version of gods do or don’t exist I think misses the point entirely. Seems rather more like an epistemic disagreement on what we believe this transcendent power to be, which theists are in agreement on regarding its existence. Most theists don’t believe their religious texts to be literal anyways, it’s different stories about the same transcendent power, being religious doesn’t mean lacking any and all nuance or historical understanding. That hasn’t been my experience with religious people at least :)

There’s plenty of audio dramas, and actual plays that are more edited and produced than, say, Critical Role.

Edit: Came across this site just now: https://audiodrama.directory/

Well that faith is primarily based on the belief that there ought to be a god, in order to explain the world in all its beauty, complexity, anthropocentricity or something like that. It’s just that their particular variety of religion seems to them the most plausible description of what said deity might be like, which isn’t incompatible with other, less plausible and outdated, ideas of God existing. Even if the plausibility of one’s religious views can be brought into question, it doesn’t really address the presumed need for a deity to exist in order to explain the world for what it is.

I think that’s completely missing the point of people’s faith lmao.

I-is that not why we’re here? 🫣

I just want to be able to use it anonymously. But then they changed their payment guidelines requiring PayPal to share my address with them. So adblocking it is 🤷🏼

Even easier to explain than Pastafarianism though.

Just like homosexuality!

Wait…

Well I haven’t updated yet, so still true for me :3

Joke’s on you, Pop hasn’t had a major update in years!

No it’s not, the processes of life as such are meaningless 🤷🏼

You could use a blowtorch 🤔