Ish. Frequency dictates bandwidth (this is a very basic statement), and meshtastic is low bandwidth. This means you can still send any amount of data you like, just like in the old days of the internet, but the more there is, the longer it takes. So meshtastic is fine for text, but would require an amazing amount of buffering to be able to send video.
Behold, Schrödinger’s shit sandwich. Now, a shit sandwich is when you take something shitty, and bracket it with two nice things. If you’ve heard of this before, you’ve probably talked to management, or more clearly, heard someone vent about talking to management. If you haven’t, well, good on you for avoiding the notice of management.
Now, what could a Schrödinger’s shit sandwich be? Well, it would have to be something that somehow both follows and rebels against that definition above. So let’s take the quote.
Ted Cruz is a piece of shit.
Ted Cruz defends free speech from government overreach.
Ted Cruz is a piece of shit.
So this could be represented as:
We’re making fun of Ted Cruz.
We’re agreeing with Ted Cruz!
We’re making fun of Ted Cruz some more.
Yep, that looks like a classic shit sandwich, alright. But! Could it not also be:
You’re thinking of Ted Cruz.
Someone is defending free speech from government overreach.
Ugh! And now there’s more Ted Cruz.
Well, fuck me if that isn’t a reverse shit sandwich! So which is it. A shit sandwich? A reverse shit sandwich? Both at the same time‽ Schrödinger’s Shit Sandwich!
But you can only be sure which one it is by taking that bite.
This might be going too far. I mean anyone could murder their girlfriend in the right circumstances. I think it’s far more reasonable to suggest a red flag after they’ve murdered perhaps three girlfriends. Certainly four.
Here’s a link to an article talking about it, including a small list of materials and if they will lose or gain electrons. I found that with a quick search, more or better ones can be found, I’m sure. I chose this one because it has the split between gain and loss, which others don’t.
Edit: working link
Once upon a time, we differentiated our apps based on their capabilities and gave them a consistent interface so people who knew how to use Windows|Linux|MacOS apps would already be familiar with how they operated. Now we differentiate on looks/user experience, and many of them arent capable at all.
The fact it’s satire doesn’t make it untrue, and we have plenty of statistics to back it up, but it seems the only thing Americans like more than complaining about their broken system is insisting that any change at all would make it worse.
There is Fossify Messages. A caveat. Fossify is a fork of some apps that were abandoned or had the license changed. After that happened, they were unmaintained for a while. That appears to have changed somewhat, but it has been 2 months since the last update on F-Droid.
The line I use is, “If I was going to bet on this situation, I’d bet against it, but it’s not enough information to make a good judgement in this case.” Much like age differences or wealth differences in relationships, or indigenous status and domestic abuse. If that’s all the info you have.
Ive always thought of it as more of a shot against the man than the woman. In your example, the man slept with someone he normally wouldn’t, for whatever reason, and only recognized that fact once his desire for sex was satisfied. The woman didn’t change in the entire situation.
Likewise, I’d say my choices in this area were poor, but had nothing to do with looks.
State-run prisons where labor can be required would also qualify as slavery by any definition.
These are not the pixels I was looking for!
Pixels coming at a premium in this picture.
The notwithstanding clause can’t negate any part of the constitution, but that is a distinction without a difference. That said, it does make it easy to call any politician who uses it a slimy piece of shit and have something to refer to for why you believe that. Not that I would ever call a politician a slimy piece of shit - our slander laws in Canada do not have a clause to use the truth as a defense.
Yes, Esperanto has many advantages of a manufactured language, but I think there are only something like 2 million speakers worldwide. If someone wanted to dip their toes into it, Harry Harrison’s Stainless Steel Rat series has Esperanto sprinkled throughout it, and has been translated into Esperanto. He was a fan. You certainly won’t learn it reading his (English) books, but the structure is very recognizable.
Well, the scientists are talking about 95%, which is 400 million people, and if people started dying out due to climate, you would see regions where people have a better time living. These would most likely be in the temperate bands, which are a narrow strip across South America and Africa, and a larger strip across North America and Eurasia. Those northern bands are thousands of kilometers long, and people have traveled those distances on foot before. Moreover, those 5000 people don’t have to be in one place, they need to join up in a few generations at worst. Also, climate collapse isn’t instant, as we are experiencing it right now, so those 5000 can start congregating before the collapse is complete. For reference, 0.1% of 8 billion is 1.6 million people. 5000 people is a third of a percent of that.
Killing every human is pretty hard.
Civilization collapse in 200 years is pretty plausible, which would go along with 95% of the population dying. For humans to go extinct would take better than 99.9% dying. 5,000 individuals would be a comfortable minimum viable population for humans to survive.
Maybe OP can tell us what kind of doctor he isn’t.
They will acknowledge they may have been lied to about one thing while happily swallowing all the other lies they’ve been told. I didn’t say they stopped being idiots, just that in the face of overwhelming proof some of them would recognize a mistake or two.
There was an utterly surreal burger commercial someone prompted that I just loved. It wasn’t really good, but it was a lot.
I first saw this used by Hugh Hefner in some reality TV show with some of his bimbos in Venice. One of them said how cool it was to be where Al Capone was born and he responded with, “You’re so pretty.” Of course, she absolutely took the compliment at face value.