CactusEcho

yes. It’s another example of african slave trade that lasted long and slaved more people than the chattel slavery. Yet it’s not considered the gravest. A valid rebuttal for:

bro the african slave trade was ongoing for centuries. what the fuck are you on about??

How about this one? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chinese_Famine

Your dad was probably alive when it happened

If it’s about duration https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Saharan_trade lasted longer and it had more victims.

Well the stuff from china doesn’t pass in hormuz strait. It goes through the suez canal.

So, it’s about influence on the current day? Silly me, to think the holocaust has more impact on the current world order than the slavery that finished in the 19th century.

and that “1 specific situation” was the industrialised destruction of culture, people, families and minds for centuries.

So it’s about duration? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Saharan_slave_trade This lasted long, wouldn’t this had more impact in the destruction of culture, people and minds?

So it’s about what? Can you explain? Because there’s no metric whatsoever that makes the chattel slavery the abhorrent behaviour with the most affected people, neither the longest one.

So please explain me what does it mean the “gravest” in this context

So it’s about the duration?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Saharan_slave_trade

There’s even youtube videos os merchants buying slaves in the 60’s.

Maybe you need to learn history from historians and not from tiktoks

Do the spanish even get oil from there? I thought they get gas from algeria and oil from nigeria

I dunno man, it really just smells like they don’t want to pay up for their crimes against humanity

Why does it counts only from 17th century onwards? Why only for 1 specific situation?

the Gravest Crime against Humanity

So now, there’s layers on suffering.

The ones that died on manmade famines, the ones that died on slavery (not chattel), the holocaust, the ones that got tortured by isis, etc… Didn’t endure enough suffering.

Which one is the best for the improvement of bike lanes and public transportation?

I don’t think being a carbrain has anything to do with left/right

Maybe more to do with the gas lead they inhaled as kids?

I think you are wrong.

Israel doesn’t want a unified Iran

I think it’s better for israel to put someone with whom they can cooperate than to let it go to a civil war.

because Iran is mostly unified under their hatred for Israel due to its various crimes.

IMHO, this isn’t true. Israel was able to pinpoint the location of top political figures extremely easy. That means that the civil society hates more the government than israel. If they hated israel more then, they wouldn’t be able to pull the moves they did (like killing a hamas top operative in a safe house)

Anyway, this is just a guessing exercise. Nobody knows the future. Let’s hope for the best for the iranian people.

Israel knows there will never be a friendly government to them in Iran, Israel knows that hatred for Israel is broad and will survive a regime change, especially one triggered by a war of aggression from Israel.

I dunno. Lots of iranians don’t like their government.

The only answers i can give you without conspiracy theories:

But why now? Why at all?

The top of the Iran administration (khamenei and top military generals) decided the meet in person. Israel found out and bombed the shit out of the building. That’s why khamenei and top military generals all died in the beginning of the war.

The negotiations were progressing in a good rhythm and it caught the US (Israel informed US right before the bombing, but there was nothing US could do) and Iran of guard.

Is Israel gaining something that I’m not seeing?

Iran is the only close country that still keeps an aggressive stand against Israel (mainly by using hezbollah as a proxy). By doing this Israel wants a more friendly government.