Ah, no one is responsible for their own actions, got it.

Or maybe it is a bad analogy, and the reason I don’t understand your position is that it doesn’t make sense.

Except an all knowing entity has absolutely no reason to run experiments. This is a bad analogy.

In your example the outcomes are different. What if the only difference was the actor who stopped the murder, would that still make a difference?

Eg: if i trip a murderer so they can’t kill the victim, vs if god causes a murderer to trip. Ia one of those violating free will and a other one not?

deleted by creator

That doesn’t make sense.

If i choose to murder someone i am impeding their free will.

If god chooses to save someone from murder, then it impedes the free will of the murderer.

Why is only one of those a problem?

You have free will though…

Do people in prison no longer have free will, are they exempt from sin?

You’ve not explained how… why are some actions required to be permitted for free will but not others.

If will is what matters, what if someone was allowed to want to do evil things but not allowed to physically perform evil actions. Would that not suffice?

Why not?

Are not evil things a series of physical actions?

Thats not true.

I lack the ability to flap my arms and fly into the air.

Does that mean I lack free will?

Why is the ability to do evil required for free will, when so many other abilities are not?

deleted by creator

Is it possible for a concept of binary gender to exist in a species which has only ever had one member?