

I feel I should be reading something into that picture. Is it code for something? /s


I feel I should be reading something into that picture. Is it code for something? /s
I’d be happy with just one leche tbf.
Congratulations on managing to offend the Iranian, Israeli and USian regimes all at the same time. Best laugh I’ve had for weeks 😂


Yes that makes a lot of sense. Make it increasingly difficult not to go green, through the tax system, rather than directly paying them to go green.
Having just returned from playing the piano for the morning Easter service, something tells me I shouldn’t be laughing at this.
But I can’t help it 😂


Great. But there’s still something fundamentally wrong with public money going to support private companies in this way. I fear this sends the message “don’t go green until the government throws you a load of money to incentivise it”. By all means, support the infrastructure (and take the income from it for the public purse), but make the shareholders pay for going green. Or just nationalise if they don’t want to.


Data are plural, as my PhD supervisor always used to say.
It still feels wrong to me when it’s used in the singular, especially in formal communication.
I feel the orange man-baby’s manhood has just been insulted.
Yes, he does. 69.35%, with just 1.06% left to be counted.
https://vtr.valasztas.hu/ogy2026/orszaggyules-osszetetele