Your answer seems to be regarding large language models and the possibility of them replacing human workers, which, to be clear, is fine and all but I was talking about ai in general.
For example, seedance is so much better than sora, veo and the like.
Recently, with the release of Open Ai’s new image model I have seen how hard it is to tell they are ai generated. Youtuber Dan Dingle made a video about it if you wanna see how good it is.
Even people who are supposedly good at spotting ai generated media often mention “vibes” instead of anything concrete when describing why they think something is ai generated.
You should stop reading marketing junk. Several of the newer models have benchmarked as worse then original releases. Many firms roll back AI deployments, some models create more errors then it would take to fire and intern and some can’t even run a vending machine business
Your answer seems to be regarding large language models and the possibility of them replacing human workers, which, to be clear, is fine and all but I was talking about ai in general.
For example, seedance is so much better than sora, veo and the like.
Recently, with the release of Open Ai’s new image model I have seen how hard it is to tell they are ai generated. Youtuber Dan Dingle made a video about it if you wanna see how good it is.
Even people who are supposedly good at spotting ai generated media often mention “vibes” instead of anything concrete when describing why they think something is ai generated.
You are fine with people loosing jobs to a technology that doesn’t work but are worried about a model that can make pixels in kinda the right order?
I don’t know if this will help you, but that’s not the worst thing.