Deconstructing the premise from first principles:

except the healthy and truthful facts stand doesn’t and never did exist.

• False: Bodies of recorded objective facts such as encyclopedia and scientific papers exist.

If it did it would be simple to train a healthy and truthful facts AI, you would simply train it off from the truthful and healthy facts.

• Logical fallacy: Assuming the antecedent, the first premise must be proved before a conclusion can be drawn.

but everyone makes up their own narrative until all written word appear relative to the AI, making it impossible for the ai to tell fact from fiction.

• Opinion. Artificial intelligence is designed to reproduce patterns. If you presume your prior premise was true, a “facts trained” AI should in theory have been able to distinguish truth from falsehood.

When you read “slop” you are simply reading the words of someone who doesn’t live in in your constructed narrative.

• Conflation: “Slop” is a pejorative term for all content generated by artificial intelligence, but particularly low quality, sloppy, one.

And now to prove it I will have plenty of down votes on this comment.

• Logical fallacy: Strawman. Constructing a poor argument in order to prove it is, itself false, at best, a waste of time.

Overall truth value: 16.17% (Mostly misleading/inflammatory comment)