• Ibisalt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 day ago

    In Switzerland, there was a vote on a petition requiring new houses to include solar panels. Conservatives opposed it, arguing that construction costs were already too high without such regulations. Instead, those same people want to build massive solar farms on untouched natural landscapes. To me, the reason is obvious: energy companies want to maintain control over a centralized power infrastructure. This way, they can keep charging us high electricity prices while pocketing subsidies for infrastructure projects.

    • Aniki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      no, it’s one thing to allow solar panels on houses, but a completely other thing to require them. i’m against the requirement as well. there’s absolutely no sane reason for that besides making people uncomfortable if they don’t want them. if they want them, they can already get them.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        A lot of the big building companies, in Europe, treat solar panels as a premium option and so charge a larger profit margin on them. Installing solar, while constructing the house is a LOT cheaper and easier than retrofitting them later.

        The panels have gotten cheap enough that it’s no longer a real cost burden, Vs the cost of the house.