• explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    owning a piece of a factory or a company they work at also does not directly change the standard of living. Reducing the fraction of the factory output that goes to the owners instead of the workers could.

    Would workers owning the company not reduce this fraction to zero?

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It would. Eliminating the HR would reduce the overhead from HR to zero. Eliminating the tax office would reduce money spent on that to zero. But these things fulfill a function. Could it be done better? Maybe. But why risk on maybes when that’s not the biggest problem we have with society at all. Not even in the top 10 if you ask me.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The people just getting paid just for owning something don’t seem to be contributing anything useful, and they’re using that wealth to make bad long-term decisions on our behalf. We can’t fix all the other stuff without the power to do so.

        • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You know, there is nothing wrong with not knowing how investments and markets (stock, commodity, …) help direct the economy. It’s a complex topic that most people really don’t need to understand for their lives. But confidently claiming they do nothing just because you don’t know is ridiculous…

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            That’s the bad long-term decisions I’m talking about. They are currently directing the economy to end the world.