On the morning of 1 October 2009, Epstein wrote to Seckel: ‘regarding cold fusion. i killed pons years ago.’ When Seckel pressed him for details — ‘How did you kill him?’ — Epstein replied with specifics, writing that ‘the origidnal senate funding came out of congress, and wayne owens senator from utah , i was there an argues against, it, had ot meet with the head of the mormon church.’
The target of Epstein’s claimed intervention was Stanley Pons, the University of Utah electrochemist who, alongside Martin Fleischmann, announced in March 1989 that they had achieved nuclear fusion at room temperature. The announcement generated global headlines and the prospect of virtually limitless clean energy. Within months, mainstream physics institutions moved to discredit the findings, funding was withdrawn, and Pons eventually relocated to a French laboratory funded by Toyota.
Wayne Owens, the figure Epstein names, was a Democratic congressman representing Utah’s 2nd district from 1987 to 1993 — Epstein refers to him as a ‘senator,’ though Owens served in the House. The congressional dimension of the cold fusion controversy is documented: the University of Utah sought $25 million (approximately £18.8 million) from Congress to fund further research, and the state legislature had separately appropriated $5 million (approximately £3.75 million). Brigham Young University, governed by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, was also entangled in the dispute through physicist Steven Jones, who had been conducting parallel cold fusion research. Epstein’s reference to meeting the head of the Mormon Church aligns with BYU’s institutional role in the congressional funding fight.



Laws like the Lex Acilia Calpurnia (67 BC) and Lex Pompeia (52 BC) imposed penalties including 10-year or lifetime bans on holding office, heavy fines, and forced exile.
Not sure if that’s what you mean, but honestly, I always say I would be more than happy to just see these evil elites have their assets seized, all future wages garnished and paid to victims, and any right to hold or attempt to influence public office stripped away and I absolutely mean it.
(Definitely preferable to the punishments they receive now. Usually nothing followed by public buildings, statues, and streets named in their honor after they depart.)
I think having to live and struggle to survive amongst the poors would be a fate worse than death for a lot of these life long nepo babies.
Also, my understanding is that the more barbaric (although admittedly more swift) forms of punishments I normally associate with the Roman justice system, were very rare for elites to ever face. They were mainly reserved for slaves and the general public. (Bc some things never change I guess)
I’m suggesting the french should have crucified the rich instead of cutting their heads off.
Yeah I figured it was either that or thrown to the lions