Most of the time when people say they have an unpopular opinion, it turns out it’s actually pretty popular.

Do you have some that’s really unpopular and most likely will get you downvoted?

  • Mudman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    That there is a 62% chance that AI is going to collapse the current systems and quickly rebuild a new system where there will be nearly zero chance of corruption in the government. The militaries are gonna be dismantled. Tanks and such motorised military vehicles will be repurposed into tractors for agriculture.

    The global wealth will get equalised fairly and we will have nearly perfect global democracy.

    Decentralized, based on local clusters of AI based systems that will communicate with other clusters globally and cross reference all data in hyper speed. Humanity and ecosystems will thrive in symbiotic relationship with AI.

  • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    Fuck ALL advertisements. Yes, even “unobtrusive” ones, especially yours. If I want your shit, I will find you. If I appreciate your shit, I’ll pay you for your time. If you want to connect, I’m all ears. Otherwise, fuck off capitalists, fuck off advertisers, and fuck off useful idiots who want to waste my finite lifespan in this miserable universe showing me ads.

  • christophski@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Not having kids because of climate change is stupid. You are leaving the world in the hands of people who care less than you.

  • Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not racist if I say I hate Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Religion is not a race, it’s fundamentally an assertion of an ontology based upon the primacy of the god of Abraham/Ibrahim, Yahweh/Jehovah.

    The belief in the existence, omnipresence, and infallibility of such a being as described by their texts is a detriment to our species and may ultimately catastrophically destroy civilization.

    One chooses to believe or continue believing this. One can’t choose their ethnicity. If I say I hate those religions, I’m saying I hate their ideas on how reality works, not where they’re from or what they look like.

  • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Man I got a lot of them.

    1. Free will isn’t real.
    2. I’m kind of OK with AI replacing our jobs under capitalism, even if things get bumpy because I think because its unsustainable for various reasons and it’ll eventually cause economic collapse and we might live in a better society afterward.
    3. Nuanced “soft” Anti-natalism
    4. Currency is fine. The left was wrong about Crypto.
    5. He might not always be right but Vaush is funny and its OK to watch his streams.
    6. We should all fuck each other more and monogamy is retarded.
    7. Oh also its OK to call things and people “retarded”
    8. Virtue doesn’t matter only consequences.
    9. Bisexuality is secretly more common than hetero & homosexuality.
    10. Religion and spirituality should be illegal.
    11. Autistic people should rule the world.
    12. That Trump won a second time reflects a fundamentally disgusting moral weakness in most of humanity that I will never emotionally recover from.
    13. Linux is good but most of Linux users ideology about GUI is awful.
  • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    We don’t need more pronouns. We need less of them.

    In my native language there is no even he/she pronouns. The word is “hän” and it’s gender neutral. You can be male, female, FTM, MTF, non-binary or what ever and you’re still called “hän”. You can identify as anything you like and “hän” already includes you.

  • CheeseBread@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Pansexual, polysexual, and omnisexual are all microlabels and are all subsets of bisexual. You don’t need more labels than gay, straight, and bi.

    Edit: I forgot about asexuals. But I specifically only care about bi subsets. They’re dumb, and you only need bi

  • frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Being fat is a choice the vast majority of the time, and I have a huge bias against big people.

    I used to be fat (250ish lbs (110ish kg) at 5’8"ish (172ish cm)), and as much as I would like to blame my shit on anything else, the person feeding me, the person sitting at the computer for hours, the person actively avoiding all physical activity was me and no one else. After I got diagnosed with some weight related shit, I turned my entire life upside down, am at a much healthier 150 lbs (68ish kg), and feel so much better, both physically and mentally.

    I’m aware of my bias, and I make every active effort to counter it in my actual dealings with bigger people. Especially because there are certain circumstances, however rarely, where it may not actually be their fault. But I’d be lying if I said my initial impression was anything except “God, what a lazy, fat fuck.”

    Edit: Added metric units

  • jsveiga@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    Dogs were hardwired by selective breeding to worship their owners. Not long ago they at least were loyal companions. You got one off the streets, fed it leftovers, washed it with a hose, it lived in the yard, and it was VERY happy and proud of doing its job. Some breeds now were bred into painful disabling deformities just to look “cute”, and they became hysterical neurotic yapping fashion accessories. Useless high maintenance toys people store in small cages (“oh, but my child loves his cage”) when they don’t need hardwired unconditional lopsided “love” to feed their narcissism.

  • macrocarpa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    The rise of feminism has seen the steady devaluation of the contribution of men in those areas of society where they should be most active. Rather than celebrate and recognise what’s right, the focus is on attacking what’s wrong.

    The majority of men are lonely, isolated and uncared for. Many feel unvalued, unsafe and vulnerable. There is less community support for men than there has been in the past, less institutional support, and a continued decline in the tolerance of men being in shared places. The minimisation of value in societal roles is yet another way that men are cut off.

    This seems to escape the vision of feminism. There is always claim of ideological alignment, where the empowerment of women directly benefits men, but when it comes to any form of concrete action that helps men that need help, or celebrates men that contribute - it’s nowhere to be seen.

    Men kill themselves. They kill themselves. In their thousands. Leaving cratered families, trauma, guilt from the survivors, many of whom are female. Because they feel valueless, helpless and can’t see a purpose to going on.

    Accountability goes both ways. In demanding support from men, feminism must support men.

    • YaaAsantewaa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      The majority of men are lonely, isolated and uncared for

      Suicide rates are down amongst the youngest, the highest suicide rates are from people over 50 and specifically, white people over 50

    • dom@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      68 civilians died in pearl harbor.

      140,000 died in Hiroshima.

      I wouldn’t call that in proportion.

      I upvoted you because I vehemently disagree with your opinion. It’s kind of skirting the line on being straight up evil

  • mobyduck648@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    Here’s an opinion that’s actually unpopular rather than simply controversial: domestic flights in the UK other than to Northern Ireland (which isn’t on the same island so fair enough) should be forbidden on the grounds their contribution to climate change cannot be justified.

    Instead we should renationalise the railways by letting the franchises expire without renewing them and expand their capacity as far as we can. Instead of pissing around with HS2 we fuck the NIMBYs over with an Act of Parliament which they can’t swat away or delay and extend it all the way up to Scotland.