The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · edit-24 days agoDo not be afraidlemmy.worldimagemessage-square41linkfedilinkarrow-up1815file-text
arrow-up1815imageDo not be afraidlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · edit-24 days agomessage-square41linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 days agoIt’s to distinguish from the contraction that who’s already expands to: “who is”. In this sentence saying “who is” makes no sense.
minus-squarechiliedogg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agoDo you have an example of a sentence where “who is” would make sense in place of a posessive?
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agoYa know, I never thought about it that way. No I can’t think of an example.
It’s to distinguish from the contraction that who’s already expands to: “who is”. In this sentence saying “who is” makes no sense.
Do you have an example of a sentence where “who is” would make sense in place of a posessive?
Ya know, I never thought about it that way. No I can’t think of an example.