I was watching some and it was all just cringe and laugh tracks.

  • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    Of course - a sitcom intended to have a laugh track, and edited that way, is always going to sound totally wrong when that element is taken out.

    The presence of a laugh track in the original show doesn’t automatically make it bad though. Many genuinely great comedies have had a laugh track included.

    • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The presence of a laugh track is irrelevant. The necessity of one for people to find the show funny is a different matter.

      • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Agreed - but with the caveat that examples where there was one, but it was later removed, don’t really count, because the way it’s done screws up the timing.

        To judge them fairly you’d have to somehow see what the same show was like if intentionally made without laughter from the start. Some might pass, others wouldn’t.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think you’re ignoring the core point of the above comment, which is that the long pauses in the show for the laughs are a planned part of the show. If you’ve never been to a recording, the audience noises aren’t spontaneous. There are signs telling the audience when to make noise.

        Live audiences sound better than canned laughs, but in terms of pacing for a sitcom, it’s the same thing.

      • aaaa@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        So did The Big Bang Theory

        The audience laughing wasn’t the problem with that show