I keep ending up with AI music in my playlist when exploring for me music. What is your workflow to avoid it? Searching DDG for me has been more bandwidth intensive than I like…

Some background. My favorite song is a song I haven’t heard yet. And my appetite sways wildly. One month it’s old school urban rap, the next it’s kpop, and then Nordic death metal and so on.

I never know what I’ll be in the mood for but I’ll find a thread with a song I don’t know and use it to build play lists to see what I find and sometimes I find trash gems that way.

This last time our friend group watched Eurovision 2026 together and some of those songs are bangers. One of them led to adding a few artists built off of playlists from that song I really liked, and they all ended up being AI… damnit!

  • hedders@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    My answer is - buy music. Not only because that way you’ll get actual human works of art by real musicians who you like, but also because that way they stand a chance of actually being able to make a living so they can, y’know, make more music.

  • Captain Howdy@lemmy.zip
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    The answer is stop using streaming services. The AI problem will only get worse as people keep paying for these services because what CEO is okay paying an artist a premium when they could instead generate slop and sell that for the same price? But your music on Bandcamp or sail the seas, just stop using Spotify.

    • hedders@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This. Streaming services are doing to music what Lars Ulrich thought Napster would do.

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Be warned that all styles of music are getting AI inserted into them.

      Your method works as long as you never use an algorithm to mix your playlist, but as soon as you do, you’re likely to get an AI track inserted into your ears, even if it’s 70s classic rock.

    • ivanvector@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I only sub to Deezer, a French streaming service that actively filters AI music and blocks it from their algorithms and search results.

    • BallShapedMan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Pretty much what every one of my friends have done. My kids were a great source in their late teens / early twenties. But as they’ve gotten older now they pretty much listen to the same stuff.

      No, I’m not going to have more kids.

  • SkavarSharraddas@gehirneimer.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    Don’t use Spotify, they actively try to put AI shit into your playlist so they have to pay less royalties. Not sure how scumbaggy other services are.

      • PlzGibHugs@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        All AI work is public domain, but also, its thought that Spotify themselves likely create some of that AI content - although I’m not familiar enough with Spotify to confirm that myself.

        • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          It can be presumed that Spotify is doing that to some degree. There is consensus amongst scientists studying the field, artists, labels and other people in the field about that.

          The public domain thing is kind a useless argument at this point; It is the case law we are building upon currently but that’s basically just because haven’t gotten a broader legal framework yet and we’re still making AI fit into what we have.

          But we don’t have to answer by citing to the law, we can answer by looking at the ethics and expecting the law to loosely follow our ethics - that’s what it is designed to do.

          • AI takes ideas from other artists without giving credit
          • AI is trained on art without paying for it
          • AI can use other artists branding and likeness without their consent
          • artists make less because AI takes an increasingly bigger cut of the revenue (it’s kinda zero-sum, but let’s skip that conversation)
          • AI music can only exist because artists exist, SE we need to keep paying artists enough to keep working
          • AI might is possibly being used in some instances for money laundering

          And so on.

          I’m trying to say this because the law is there to follow our feelings. If we structurally don’t condone something to a certain level as a society, we make it illegal or we regulate it.

          And as you can see, there’s plenty of reasons to regulate and some are straight up financial, so we definitely should do something about it.

          And with “we” I mean specifically the Republicans and Democrats, the FCC (regulation to combat market disruption), judges, civil rights lawyers, and possible plaintiffs all have the chance to push us into a better position societally.

          Shoutout to Bernie Sanders, he’s trying to start a movement about it, and as always he’s ahead of the curve in Congress.

          • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago
            • AI music can only exist because artists exist, SE we need to keep paying artists enough to keep working

            You’re wrong about that. Plenty of people do music as a hobby. There will always be more content to scrape. Expecting the system to crash because nobody plays music anymore is unrealistic.

  • thezeesystem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Listen to songs that are more then 10 years old. My autism doesn’t like new music so I just have a playlist of over 4k. Although I did add a few from music creators from TikTok. Very little though. I’m quite strict

  • WFH@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    Are you using Spotify ?

    Because they are mainly known for 2 things:

    • they are nazi cunts who platform nazi cunts and play ads for nazi cunts
    • they flood their library with slop as a way to funnel money to themselves rather than to legitimate artists.

    I’m not aware of a streaming service completely free of slop, but I know some like Qobuz are actively detecting and removing it.

  • xpey@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Never stumbled upon AI generated music ever.

    I have my local library with ripped CDs and pirated music mostly from the 2010s and below.

    When I feel like discovering new music, I

    • browse forums to find arists similar to those I already listen to
    • I search for artists that have been featured in a collab in songs I already listen to
    • Or, I use ListenBrainz’s Weekly Exploration tab when I’m feeling bored.

    No streaming bullshit, AI algorithms made to keep me hooked, and definetly no AI music to be seen or heard.

      • xpey@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Also +1 to the guy that mentioned to listen to your local music scene! I have as many smaller local artists as I possibly can in my library. I’m always looking for random stickers on the streets or festival posters, and then I get home and look all of them up to see if they’re my jam.

  • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Now, this is also what pisses me off about ai. I listen to older music to stay away from it. That might sound crazy, but the world is crazy…