• chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      No, it doesn’t. It never would, because NHTSA knows that utilizing all lanes during a lane closure reduces backups. Show me a sign where it tells drivers to merge now that isn’t at the actual merge and I will eat a hat

      • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        It does NOT reduce backups. You cannot magically increase throughput by cramming in before the bottleneck. It can reduce how physically long a backup gets, which can keep backups from growing off of the highway. Though you still cannot magically add throughput by cramming in ahead of a bottleneck. Ever. Period.

        • TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          You can add throughput by zipper merging predictably all day long instead of every car jockeying for position and feeling entitled to block other road users from legally merging and causing all kinds of road rage based holdups though

          • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            Yes, if people were able to drive like robots. Though once traffic is already slow in the through-lanes, rushing up to the end of the closed lane and cramming in HURTS THROUGHPUT. Always. For ever. Period.

            • TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 days ago

              No it doesn’t. And people don’t every day, all over the world. Mostly without even needing signage.