One would get you ~2-3 bags of heroin but black tar heroines haven’t been sold since the 1860s in the US thankfully, so I couldn’t quote you a price on that.

How exactly does “seeing a man wearing shorts and hoodie” affect your “nice evening?” Seems weird to let something so small that is completely unrelated to you affect you so much that you feel disrespected. Honestly I’d argue your projection is more a reflection on you here.

Ich sprache eine geschichtswitz, ja.

Leben

Raum

Uh oh, someone warn Poland!

(C’mon, that was funny lmao).

You’d be surprised, people do indeed shoot coke or meth. They’ve also been known to use sprite when they didn’t have water, which is actually crazier when you think about it.

Depends on your location. You at Wildwood? Lol

I believe he is making a joke regarding the practice of consuming drugs via intravenous injections, also commonly known as “shooting up.” The precipice of the joke appears to be the expectation that when one “takes neither and shows up drunk”, and the twist is that “rather than showing up drunk he’s doing hard drugs such as heroin, cocaine, or even methamphetamine or other commonly shot drugs” wherein lies the humor. Though that is simply my interpretation, and perhaps the original poster will be so kind as to elucidate, we shall see.

Can’t forget Guy LeDouche!

deleted by creator

I am not a fan of initiating violence either generally

Coulda fooled me. Seems to be you’re the one in this convo advocating for it, and as further evidence to that point you’re still literally incapable of even understanding my argument all these comments later despite me literally telling you that my argument is “initiating violence is bad.”

I’m gonna go with “nuh uh” on this one, I straight up do not believe you truthfully aren’t a “fan” of initiating violence after having spent this entire convo advocating and excusing exactly what you claim you’re not a fan of. Something tells me you enjoy it, not sure what, but I think it was you literally saying you enjoy it.

I’m actually an anarchist tyvm

Mmhmm I’ve heard that one before. If true, great.

You were the one who said that you would cut contact or argue;

cut contact or argue

argue

HOLY SHIT WHO PUT THAT THERE?! Oh me. Well good, then I can continue to argue without contradicting myself, phew.

Really thought that was your slam dunk? You’re really bad at this. If you were this SJW admin and we were talking about trans stuff, guess I’d still be arguing with you.

To translate it for you since you seem to be having issues differentiating violence from conversation, I was saying I’m not going to beat this admin up for saying shit I don’t agree with, instead I’ll either cut contact (as in not talk to them, walk away, or here “block”) or (like this) argue. You’ll notice I’m also not beating you up because we disagree on initiating violence. Probably because my whole argument is “that’s bad.”

This fun for you? It is for me lol.

Idek who the admin there is, but I’m also arguing with an .ml tankie, does that mean I’m supporting nutomic because his site is facilitating that? By interacting with the internet at all through companies like cloudflare, whatever device you use, your ISP, does that mean you support capitalism? Maybe you should self isolate from them yourself. By using a Mali TLD does that mean you support everything the Mali gov does including their arbitrary detentions, enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings?

Probably not, you’re probably not dumb enough to actually believe that bullshit argument you put up, you just think I am. Nice try but no dice.

Too bad you can’t resort to violence because this is the internet and you have to use your words, I can see why you’re prone to violence if this is the limit of your argumentative prowess.

But they are denying the current persecution of the uyghurs; denying the various historical atrocities like the holodomor, Tienanmen square, the katyn massacre, etc; excusing the ones they can’t deny; and simping for authoritarianism. Oh and lets not forget a decent contingent of them agree with nutomic that transness is bourgoise.

So what you’re saying is tankies should be violently persecuted for their words with no other provocation by people like me who disagree with them. Lucky for you, were we arguing IRL I wouldn’t get violent until you do, because I’m not a piece of shit. Enjoy it all you like, and I’ll judge you all I like.

Sure, then again tankies suck but I don’t think people should initiate violence against them for their words, I’ll just argue or cut comtact. Guess that’s what makes me better than you.

I’m gonna be honest, kicking the shit out of a nerd because you don’t agree with his words is not as cool as you seem to think.

Sure he was “wrong,” but did anyone try “please leave, we no longer wish to discuss these matters with you” before jumping to initiating violence? Multiple attackers no less (which would meet the threshold of deadly force in most states, luckily for them not Greece).

Back in my day children were taught to use their words, but I guess immature adults that are incapable of doing so still have to bully people physically, sucks to suck I guess, get eloquent losers.

Oh well I guess I do that then lol. My technique (which is, I think, normal) is to melt my butter (probably too much) on like 2, really low, and then crank it to maybe 4.5-5ish and throw the food on as it warms up, then do the food cooking part (whatever that needs depending.)

Alright you’ve piqued my interest, what’s this technique? I have no problems with sticking on my buttered steel pan as is so I’m wondering if I already do something close.

Me, with a flipper zero: SkipSkipSkipSkip…

Yeah that’s the “kinda” part, sometimes for sure that happens, but that’s different than say something like “literally now means figuratively due to people misusing it” doesn’t mean it’s actually correct even if a dictionary were to adopt it.

Furthermore I believe words don’t have to be in the dictionary to be “correct,” imo embiggen is a perfectly cromulent word whether or not some people who compile a book agree. I just don’t think that “many being incorrect” deserves to be a reason words change to new meanings necessarily, maybe sometimes, but sometimes also “no they’re just wrong.”

Bovine is more scientific, I can’t say that I’ve heard it in regular speech myself, but 'round here people usually say cow, steer, or bull depending on which it is.

Ehhh, kinda. If enough people call a duck a chicken for dictionary.com to add

5. (loosely) some call ducks chickens

That doesn’t mean ducks are now chickens, it just means so many people were incorrect it had to be noted.