i mean, transgender people can definitely be assholes as anyone else, but such edit makes no sense to me. fifth panel should add some unexpected twist taking the story to yet another level, and this would be literally just repeating the same pun twice.

it is not a personal attack on you, but it still doesn’t makes sense.

if someone asks “can i find good french restaurant in this city?” “no” is not the correct answer, just because i, or even majority of people, don’t know one.

it IS possible to tell sex of the dog. it depends on the breed, it may be easier with some, and people who are well familiar with the specific breed will be more successful than just random person.

but the fact that lot of people will answer incorrectly, or don’t care, doesn’t imply it is not possible.

point of my comment is: “you are wrong. it is possible to tell sex of a dog. whether some people around you are wrong all the time is no proof one way or the other.”

Nope unless you see them pee.

nonsense

People are wrong about the sex of dogs all the time. they don’t care

people can be wrong about what is 8+7, that doesn’t mean it is impossible to tell what the result is.

etsy store and career in one sentence sounds funny, but other than that i generally agree…

slowly but surely move left on the x-axis of that bell curve

well good news, since it is happening to all of us, you may actually keep getting worse, but keep your place on that curve 😆

pretty sure the answer is “whichever they want, unless they are limited intelectually”. not everyone can become nasa engineer, but everyone can become nepotistic manager in their dad’s company.

she’d get caught up in a bigger lie

how would she get caught in a bigger lie? it is her fucking business when she does or does not want to drink alcohol. and even if she drank alcohol some other time, does not mean she must be in mood for it every waking moment. i know, hindsight is 20/20, but the point is that people need to normalize not getting drunk and not having to explain to anyone why they don’t want to.

to reveal she was pregnant by offering her alcohol and Mariah basically had to admit she was pregnant as to why she wouldn’t drink alcohol

kind of lame that the only reason people can imagine for not drinking an alcohol is “i am pregnant”

and i answered that. people are terrible at diagnosing themselves. even if someone gives you some criteria, it is hard to put them in the context if you don’t have the experience and comparison with others. that is the job for the professional.

one finds out by talking to a specialist, instead of random people on the internet.

objectively

I don’t think you understand meaning of that word

We are not pretending. Debugged and working reliably is better than new. Being new is not automatically useful attribute.

Why would anyone want candidate with criminal history? There are, in fact, stupid questions…

unless Borat runs your countries

if borat ran your country it would be heavy improvement for you. are you sure you want to be dismissive about other countries?

so to recap: this is the truck for which they make navigation for trucks.

data from such navigations for trucks can’t be useful for civilian cars for reasons stated above, which was my point. this concludes my contribution to this discussion.

On another note, how does the bread get from the bakery to the restaurant where you are if not for trucks?

ok, lets define the terms.

this is the truck (the one they make special navigation for. the one that is basically just a van does not need special navigation, it uses the same one as passenger cars.):

so what kind of restaurants are you visiting and how much bread do they use there? 😂

it might probably depend on your location, but where i live trucks have one lane and they they are forbidden by law to block the other ones (not that they respect that to the letter). but the trucks may be standing still while the other lanes are fine (or at least not standing still). then the information from truck navigation means nothing for me in passenger car.

another point is that trucks run some specific routes, they drive from a factory to some warehouse, but they don’t randomly drive aroud the city center. they also just can’t physically take some routes (sharp turns, narrow roads, low bridges, etc.)

so the data from trucks only cover small part of the road network and on top of that some of them is not relevant for passenger cars.

This is saying trump is a baby who never developed it.

it is also saying that he expected the same from news readers. and to be honest this is how news cycles and the idea that readers can only pay attention to one scandal at a time worked for a long time and this strategy was generally working, so you know you fucked up hard when you try to cover your fuck up with a war and it is not working.

Apparently the same goes for child fuckers

for some of them. more data would be needed to determine whether it applies for all of them.

traffic data from trucks can’t be very useful for civilian traffic.